Research Article
Kathy Swor
Kathy Swor
Independent Researcher, 1432 W.
Heartland Dr., Kuna, ID 83634, USA.
Ambika Poudel
Ambika Poudel
Aromatic
Plant Research Center, 230 N 1200 E, Suite 100, Lehi, UT 84043, USA.
Ambika Poudel
Ambika Poudel
Aromatic
Plant Research Center, 230 N 1200 E, Suite 100, Lehi, UT 84043, USA.
Prabodh Satyal
Prabodh Satyal
Aromatic
Plant Research Center, 230 N 1200 E, Suite 100, Lehi, UT 84043, USA.
William N. Setzer*
William N. Setzer*
Corresponding author
Aromatic
Plant Research Center, 230 N 1200 E, Suite 100, Lehi, UT 84043, USA.
And
Department
of Chemistry, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899, USA.
E-mail: setzerw@uah.edu, wsetzer@chemistry.uah.edu;
Tel.: +1-256-468-2862
Abstract
Salvia
dorrii (purple sage) is an understudied member of Salvia
that inhabits the western United States, but has traditional medicinal
importance to native peoples throughout its native range. The purpose of this
study is to examine the essential oil composition of four Salvia dorrii
var. incana samples collected from plants growing in southeastern
Oregon. The essential oils were obtained from aerial parts by hydrodistillation
and analyzed by gas chromatography, including enantioselective gas
chromatography. The major components in the essential oils were 1,8-cineole
(20.4-37.0%), bornyl acetate (5.2-19.2%), (–)-(E)-β-caryophyllene
(3.3-12.4%), α-bisabolol (3.0-8.8%), α-pinene (3.1-5.5%, predominantly
(+)-α-pinene), β-phellandrene (0.1-9.8%, predominantly (+)-β-phellandrene), and
camphor (0.5-7.5%, predominantly (+)-camphor). This report is the first
investigation of S. dorrii var. incana essential oil. The work is
preliminary, however, and additional research is needed on other S. dorrii
infraspecific taxa and from other geographical locations.
Keywords
Purple sage, gas chromatography, enantiomers, chiral.
1. Introduction
There are more than 1000 recognized species of Salvia L. (Lamiaceae) according to World Flora Online [1] and many of these have been examined in terms of essential oil composition and biological activities [2–5]. Several Salvia essential oils are important for aromatic therapy, including Salvia desoleana Atzei & V. Picci (Sardinian sage), Salvia fruticosa Mill. (Greek oregano), Salvia lavandulifolia Vahl (syn. Salvia officinalis subsp. lavandulifolia (Vahl) Gams, Spanish sage), Salvia officinalis L. (Dalmatian sage), Salvia sclarea L. (clary sage), Salvia somalensis Vatke (Somalian sage), Salvia stenophylla Burch. ex Benth. (blue mountain sage), and Salvia triloba L.f. (syn. Salvia fruticosa Mill., Greek sage) [6].
Salvia dorrii (Kellogg) Abrams (purple sage, Lamiaceae) is found throughout the western United States from Washington to northern Baja California, Mexico, and east to western Idaho, western Utah, and northern Arizona [7]. There are several infraspecific taxa, namely Salvia dorrii subsp. dorrii (found from southern Oregon, southwestern Idaho, eastern California, Nevada, western Utah, and northern Arizona), Salvia dorrii subsp. mearnsii (Britton) E.M. McClint. (found only in central Arizona, Salvia dorrii var. clokeyi Strachan (found only in southern Nevada), Salvia dorrii var. incana (Benth.) Strachan (syn. Salvia dorrii var. carnosa (Douglas ex Greene) Abrams) (found in Washington, Oregon, and southwestern Idaho), and Salvia dorrii var. pilosa (A. Gray) Strachan & Reveal (found in southern California, southern Nevada, and northwestern Arizona) (Fig. 1).
Figure 1. Range map of Salvia dorrii subspecies based on Strachan, 1982 [7].
The plant is a woody perennial shrub that grows up to 80 cm tall and 150 cm wide. The leaves are opposite oval, 1.5-4 cm long, 0.5-1.5 cm wide, widest at the tip and tapering to the stem. The inflorescence is made up of clusters of several purple flowers. Each cluster is 10-24 mm wide with purple, blue, or rose bracts (Fig. 2) [8]. The Paiute people used a poultice of crushed leaves for chest congestion or coughs from colds, the Shoshoni took an infusion or decoction of the leaves to treat colds [9].
Figure 2. Salvia dorrii. A: Photograph of the plant at the time of collection by K. Swor. B: Scan of the pressed plant material.
Abietane diterpenoids have been isolated and characterized from S. dorrii [10]. To our knowledge, however, there have been no previous publications on the essential oil of this plant species. As part of our program investigating the essential oils of aromatic and medicinal plants of the intermountain western United States, we present the essential oil obtained from aerial parts of S. dorrii collected from southeastern Oregon. Based on the descriptions and the geographical range [7,11], this is most likely Salvia dorrii var. incana (Benth.) Strachan (syn. Salvia dorrii var. carnosa (Douglas ex Greene) Abrams).
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Plant material
Aerial parts of S. dorrii var. incana were collected on 8 May 2024 from four individual plants growing in Lake Owyhee State Park (Table 1). The plant was identified in the field by W.N. Setzer using a field guide [12] and verified by comparison with samples from the C.V. Starr Virtual Herbarium [13]. A voucher specimen (WNS-Sdi-0115) was deposited in the University of Alabama in Huntsville Herbarium. The fresh plant material was stored frozen at –20 °C until processed. The fresh-frozen plant material was hydrodistilled using a Likens-Nickerson apparatus with continuous extraction of the distillate with dichloromethane (Table 1).
Table 1. Plant collection and hydrodistillation yields of Salvia dorrii var. incana from southeastern Oregon
Plant samples | Locations | Mass aerial parts (g) | Mass essential oil (g) | Yield (%) |
A | 43°37′00″ N, 117°14′54″ W, elevation 845 m asl | 131.29 | 3.0642 | 2.334 |
B | 43°37′00″ N, 117°14′54″ W, elevation 845 m asl | 140.19 | 2.5921 | 1.849 |
C | 43°36′54″ N, 117°14′58″ W, elevation 847 m asl | 86.57 | 1.8702 | 2.160 |
D | 43°36′54″ N, 117°14′58″ W, elevation 847 m asl | 91.72 | 2.0261 | 2.209 |
2.2. Essential oils extraction
The fresh-frozen plant material was hydrodistilled for four hours using a Likens-Nickerson apparatus with continuous extraction of the distillate with dichloromethane (Table 1).
2.3. Gas chromatographic analysis
The four S. dorrii var. incana essential oils were analyzed by gas chromatography (GC-MS, GC-FID, and chiral GC-MS) as reported previously [14]. Retention indices were calculated using the method of van den Dool and Kratz [15]. Essential oil components were identified by comparison of mass spectral fragmentation patterns and retention indices found in the Adams [16], FFNSC3 [17], NIST20 [18], and Satyal [19] databases.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Essential oil composition
Four samples of S. dorrii were collected from Lake Owyhee State Park, eastern Oregon. Hydrodistillation gave yellow essential oils in 1.85-2.33% yield. The essential oils were analyzed by gas chromatographic methods (GC-MS, GC-FID). A total of 119 compounds were identified, which accounted for 99.9-100.0% of the compositions (Table 2). Although the S. dorrii samples are qualitatively similar to one another, there are notable differences in concentrations. It is not clear what is responsible for the differences in compositions. The plants were collected on the same day from similar locations, so edaphic, climate, or phenology are not factors. The major components were 1,8-cineole (20.4-37.0%), bornyl acetate (5.2-19.2%), (E)-β-caryophyllene (3.3-12.4%), α-bisabolol (3.0-8.8%), β-phellandrene (0.1-9.8%), α-pinene (3.1-5.5%), and camphor (0.5-7.5%).
Table 2. Essential oil composition of four Salvia dorrii var. incana samples from southeastern Oregon
Compounds | RIcalc | RIdb | Composition (%) | |||
A | B | C | D | |||
Hashishene | 917 | 919 | tr | tr | 0.1 | tr |
Tricyclene | 922 | 923 | 0.1 | tr | tr | tr |
α-Thujene | 924 | 925 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
α-Pinene | 932 | 932 | 3.7 | 3.1 | 5.5 | 5.2 |
Ethyl tiglate | 937 | 938 | - | tr | - | - |
α-Fenchene | 946 | 948 | tr | tr | tr | tr |
Camphene | 948 | 950 | 3.4 | 2.3 | 1.5 | 1.7 |
Thuja-2,4(10)-diene | 952 | 953 | tr | tr | tr | tr |
Sabinene | 971 | 971 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
β-Pinene | 977 | 978 | 1.6 | 2.6 | 4.2 | 2.2 |
1-Octen-3-ol | 979 | 978 | - | tr | tr | tr |
3-Octanone | 985 | 986 | tr | tr | tr | tr |
Myrcene | 988 | 989 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
Dehydro-1,8-cineole | 989 | 990 | tr | tr | tr | tr |
p-Mentha-1(7),8-diene | 1004 | 1004 | 0.1 | tr | 0.1 | 0.2 |
α-Phellandrene | 1007 | 1007 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.5 |
δ-3-Carene | 1008 | 1009 | tr | tr | tr | tr |
α-Terpinene | 1017 | 1018 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
Ethyl 3-methyl-3-butenyl carbonate | 1022 | 1022 | 0.1 | tr | tr | tr |
p-Cymene | 1025 | 1025 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 2.7 |
Limonene | 1029 | 1030 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 0.7 |
β-Phellandrene | 1032 | 1031 | 9.8 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 4.8 |
1,8-Cineole | 1033 | 1032 | 20.4 | 25.5 | 37.0 | 31.5 |
(Z)-β-Ocimene | 1034 | 1034 | 0.3 | 1.4 | tr | 0.3 |
(E)-β-Ocimene | 1045 | 1045 | tr | 0.2 | tr | tr |
Phenylacetaldehyde | 1047 | 1045 | - | - | tr | tr |
Prenyl isobutyrate | 1051 | 1050 | - | - | tr | tr |
γ-Terpinene | 1057 | 1057 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 0.2 |
cis-Sabinene hydrate | 1070 | 1069 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Terpinolene | 1084 | 1086 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
p-Cymenene | 1091 | 1093 | tr | tr | tr | 0.1 |
Linalool | 1100 | 1101 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.6 |
trans-Sabinene hydrate | 1101 | 1101 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | tr |
Hotrienol | 1104 | 1104 | tr | tr | tr | tr |
3-Methyl-3-butenyl 3-methylbutanoate | 1111 | 1110 | tr | tr | tr | tr |
trans-p-Mentha-2,8-dien-1-ol | 1122 | 1121 | tr | tr | tr | tr |
cis-p-Menth-2-en-1-ol | 1125 | 1124 | 0.2 | tr | 0.2 | 0.4 |
(4E,6Z)-allo-Ocimene | 1128 | 1128 | tr | 0.1 | - | tr |
α-Campholenal | 1128 | 1127 | tr | tr | 0.1 | tr |
Limona ketone | 1133 | 1131 | tr | tr | tr | tr |
cis-p-Mentha-2,8-dien-1-ol | 1137 | 1137 | tr | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
trans-Pinocarveol | 1141 | 1141 | - | - | 0.1 | - |
(3Z)-Hexenyl isobutanoate | 1141 | 1141 | 0.1 | 0.1 | - | 0.1 |
trans-p-Menth-2-en-1-ol | 1143 | 1142 | 0.1 | tr | 0.1 | 0.2 |
trans-Verbenol | 1146 | 1146 | - | - | tr | tr |
Camphor | 1149 | 1149 | 1.1 | 7.5 | 4.4 | 0.5 |
Camphene hydrate | 1156 | 1156 | tr | tr | tr | tr |
Pinocarvone | 1164 | 1164 | - | - | tr | tr |
δ-Terpineol | 1171 | 1170 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.4 |
Borneol | 1173 | 1173 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 0.4 |
Terpinen-4-ol | 1181 | 1180 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.3 |
p-Cymen-8-ol | 1189 | 1188 | tr | tr | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Cryptone | 1189 | 1187 | tr | - | 0.1 | 0.1 |
α-Terpineol | 1196 | 1195 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 0.9 |
cis-Piperitol | 1201 | 1201 | tr | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
trans-Piperitol | 1210 | 1209 | 0.1 | - | tr | 0.1 |
(3Z)-Hexenyl 2-methylbutanoate | 1232 | 1231 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 |
(3Z)-Hexenyl 3-methylbutanoate | 1237 | 1235 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 |
Bornyl acetate | 1287 | 1285 | 19.2 | 12.8 | 5.2 | 7.0 |
Thymol | 1295 | 1293 | - | - | - | 0.1 |
Carvacrol | 1302 | 1300 | tr | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
exo-2-Hydroxycineole acetate | 1340 | 1337 | tr | 0.1 | - | tr |
Bornyl propionate | 1377 | 1377 | tr | 0.1 | tr | tr |
7-epi-Sesquithujene | 1387 | 1387 | 0.1 | tr | 0.2 | 0.1 |
(E)-Jasmone | 1388 | 1390 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
(Z)-Jasmone | 1396 | 1394 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.7 |
(Z)-β-Caryophyllene | 1404 | 1405 | 0.1 | 0.1 | tr | 0.1 |
Decyl acetate | 1410 | 1412 | - | 0.1 | - | 0.1 |
(E)-β-Caryophyllene | 1420 | 1417 | 9.2 | 12.4 | 3.3 | 8.5 |
γ-Maaliene | 1427 | 1430 | - | - | 0.1 | - |
trans-α-Bergamotene | 1432 | 1432 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
α-Maaliene | 1434 | 1435 | - | - | 0.1 | - |
Aromadendrene | 1439 | 1438 | - | - | 1.3 | tr |
(Z)-β-Farnesene | 1440 | 1439 | 0.1 | tr | - | 0.1 |
cis-Muurola-3,5-diene | 1446 | 1446 | tr | 0.1 | - | 0.1 |
iso-Germacrene D | 1446 | 1447 | - | - | 0.2 | - |
α-Himachalene | 1450 | 1449 | - | - | - | 0.1 |
(E)-β-Farnesene | 1452 | 1452 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 |
α-Humulene | 1456 | 1454 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.6 |
cis-Muurola-4(14),5-diene | 1462 | 1463 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
γ-Muurolene | 1475 | 1475 | tr | 0.1 | - | - |
γ-Curcumene | 1477 | 1478 | 0.1 | tr | 0.1 | 0.1 |
ar-Curcumene | 1481 | 1480 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 |
trans-β-Bergamotene | 1483 | 1483 | 0.1 | tr | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Phenylethyl 2-methylbutanoate | 1487 | 1489 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Viridiflorene | 1491 | 1491 | - | - | 0.1 | - |
Phenylethyl 3-methylbutanoate | 1493 | 1493 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
α-Zingiberene | 1495 | 1494 | 0.1 | - | - | tr |
Bicyclogermacrene | 1496 | 1497 | - | - | 0.2 | - |
trans-Muurola-4(14),5-diene | 1496 | 1496 | 0.1 | 0.1 | tr | 0.1 |
β-Bisabolene | 1508 | 1510 | 3.6 | 1.2 | 2.7 | 2.5 |
β-Curcumene | 1509 | 1511 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 |
γ-Cadinene | 1513 | 1512 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
δ-Cadinene | 1518 | 1518 | tr | 0.1 | 0.1 | tr |
trans-Calamenene | 1521 | 1519 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
β-Sesquiphellandrene | 1524 | 1524 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
(E)-α-Bisabolene | 1540 | 1541 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.4 |
cis-Sesquisabinene hydrate | 1544 | 1544 | 0.1 | tr | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Spathulenol | 1579 | 1576 | - | - | 0.3 | - |
Caryophyllene oxide | 1583 | 1587 | 1.6 | 3.7 | 2.3 | 3.1 |
Globulol | 1587 | 1590 | - | - | 0.2 | - |
Geranyl 2-methylbutanoate | 1596 | 1596 | 0.1 | tr | 0.2 | - |
Geranyl 3-methylbutanoate | 1604 | 1604 | 0.1 | tr | 0.1 | - |
β-Atlantol | 1608 | 1611 | 0.1 | tr | 0.2 | 0.1 |
Humulene epoxide II | 1611 | 1611 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 |
1,10-di-epi-Cubenol | 1616 | 1616 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 1.5 |
(3Z)-Hexenyl phenylacetate | 1633 | 1634 | tr | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.7 |
Caryophylla-4(12),8(13)-dien-5α-ol | 1635 | 1630 | - | 0.1 | - | - |
Caryophylla-4(12),8(13)-dien-5β-ol | 1639 | 1636 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.6 |
τ-Cadinol | 1644 | 1643 | 0.9 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 2.9 |
α-Bisabolol oxide B | 1655 | 1655 | 0.2 | tr | 0.3 | 0.6 |
β-Eudesmol | 1657 | 1656 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 2.6 |
14-Hydroxy-9-epi-(E)-caryophyllene | 1672 | 1671 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.5 |
β-Bisabolol | 1672 | 1674 | 0.1 | 0.1 | tr | tr |
α-Bisabolol | 1688 | 1688 | 8.8 | 3.0 | 8.2 | 7.4 |
Isopimara-9(11),15-diene | 1911 | 1908 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Phenylethyl phenylacetate | 1915 | 1915 | - | - | - | 0.1 |
Abietatriene | 2052 | 2049 | tr | tr | tr | tr |
Serratol | 2146 | 2143 | - | tr | - | tr |
Compound classes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monoterpene hydrocarbons |
|
| 23.0 | 16.4 | 17.0 | 19.6 |
Oxygenated monoterpenoids |
|
| 44.7 | 50.0 | 50.9 | 42.7 |
Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons |
|
| 17.0 | 17.0 | 12.0 | 15.2 |
Oxygenated sesquiterpenoids |
|
| 13.9 | 14.5 | 18.9 | 19.7 |
Diterpenoids |
|
| 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Benzenoid aromatics |
|
| 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.9 |
Others |
|
| 1.1 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 1.7 |
Total identified |
|
| 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 99.9 |
RIcalc = Retention index determined with respect to a homologous series of n-alkanes on a ZB-5ms column. RIdb = Reference retention index obtained from the databases [16–19]. tr = trace (< 0.05%).
This is the first report on the essential oil composition of S. dorrii, so there are no previous reports to compare. However, the composition obtained is similar to those reported for other Salvia species. In fact, there are at least five chemotypes of S. officinalis; one of these chemotypes is a 1,8-cineole/camphor chemotype that shows 1,8-cineole (39.9 ± 16.3%), camphor (12.9 ± 5.6%), α-pinene (4.1 ± 1.7%), (E)-β-caryophyllene (3.1 ± 1.7%), and bornyl acetate (0.8 ± 0.7%) [20]. Similarly, three chemotypes of S. lavandulifolia have been described, including a 1,8-cineole/pinene chemotype with 1,8-cineole (16.5 ± 7.8%), α-pinene (12.2 ± 6.1%), camphor (9.2 ± 6.8%), (E)-β-caryophyllene (4.3 ± 2.2%), and bornyl acetate (0.8 ± 0.9%) [21].
The major components of S. dorrii essential oils, 1,8-cineole, bornyl acetate, and (E)-β-caryophyllene, have shown anti-inflammatory activities generally by decreasing pro-inflammatory factors [22]. 1,8-Cineole has also demonstrated protective effects on the respiratory system in animal models by inhibiting inflammatory factors (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, NF-κB) and modulating neutrophils and macrophages [23]. Furthermore, human clinical trials have indicated that 1,8-cineole shows beneficial effects in treating respiratory disorders such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, bronchitis, and rhinosinusitis [24, 25]. Additionally, 1,8-cineole lowered the severity and shortened the duration of the common cold [26] and camphor showed antitussive effects in animal models [27, 28]. Thus, the composition of S. dorrii essential oil is consistent with the traditional Paiute and Shoshoni use of this plant to treat chest congestion, coughs, and colds.
3.2. Enantiomeric distribution of chiral monoterpenoids
Enantioselective GC-MS was carried out on the S. dorrii essential oils (Table 3) in order to more fully characterize the essential oil composition. The predominant enantiomers were (+)-α-thujene (70.7 ± 11.9%), (+)-α-pinene (60.6 ± 9.2%), (–)-camphene (72.2 ± 17.9%), (–)-β-pinene 58.6 ± 4.6%), (+)-α-phellandrene (100%), (+)-β-phellandrene (99.3 ± 0.7%), (–)-linalool (86.5 ± 2.9%), (+)-camphor (99.2 ± 0.9%), and (+)-α-terpineol (95.1 ± 9.9%). Limonene, terpinen-4-ol, and borneol showed inconsistent enantiomeric distributions. That is, the major enantiomers for limonene, terpinen-4-ol, and borneol are not consistent over the four samples.
Table 3. Enantiomeric distribution of chiral monoterpenoid components in Salvia dorrii var. incana essential oil from southeastern Oregon
Enatiomers | RIcalc | RIdb | Composition (%) | |||
A | B | C | D | |||
(+)-α-Thujene | 951 | 950 | 53.4 | 80.7 | 74.3 | 74.6 |
(–)-α-Thujene | 952 | 951 | 46.6 | 19.3 | 25.7 | 25.4 |
(–)-α-Pinene | 975 | 976 | 48.6 | 26.6 | 41.6 | 40.7 |
(+)-α-Pinene | 980 | 982 | 51.4 | 73.4 | 58.4 | 59.3 |
(–)-Camphene | 999 | 998 | 88.5 | 55.1 | 58.4 | 86.8 |
(+)-Camphene | 1004 | 1005 | 11.5 | 44.9 | 41.6 | 13.2 |
(+)-β-Pinene | 1026 | 1027 | 44.4 | 46.2 | 36.9 | 38.0 |
(–)-β-Pinene | 1032 | 1031 | 55.6 | 53.8 | 63.1 | 62.0 |
(–)-α-Phellandrene | n.d. | 1050 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
(+)-α-Phellandrene | 1054 | 1053 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
(–)-Limonene | 1076 | 1073 | 60.9 | 22.3 | 36.2 | 51.9 |
(+)-Limonene | 1081 | 1081 | 39.1 | 77.7 | 63.8 | 48.1 |
(–)-β-Phellandrene | 1084 | 1083 | 0.6 | - | 1.4 | 0.0 |
(+)-β-Phellandrene | 1089 | 1089 | 99.4 | - | 98.6 | 100.0 |
(–)-Linalool | 1218 | 1228 | 86.2 | 90.4 | 85.9 | 83.4 |
(+)-Linalool | 1223 | 1231 | 13.8 | 9.6 | 14.1 | 16.6 |
(–)-Camphor | 1255 | 1253 | 1.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.7 |
(+)-Camphor | 1257 | 1259 | 98.6 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 98.3 |
(+)-Terpinen-4-ol | 1298 | 1297 | 32.1 | 52.8 | 63.8 | 53.5 |
(–)-Terpinen-4-ol | 1302 | 1300 | 67.9 | 47.2 | 36.2 | 46.5 |
(–)-Borneol | 1339 | 1335 | 73.9 | 43.7 | 62.0 | 71.3 |
(+)-Borneol | 1346 | 1340 | 26.1 | 56.3 | 38.0 | 28.7 |
(–)-α-Terpineol | 1349 | 1347 | 19.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
(+)-α-Terpineol | 1359 | 1356 | 80.2 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
RIdb = Retention index from our in-house database based on commercially available compounds available from Sigma-Aldrich and augmented with our own data. RIcalc = Calculated retention index based on a series of n-alkanes on a Restek B-Dex 325 capillary column. n.d. = not detected.
This is the first report describing the enantiomeric distributions of terpenoid components of S. dorrii. However, there have been several investigations on enantiomeric distribution in other Salvia species for comparison (Table 4). The enantiomeric distributions for α-pinene, limonene, and camphor are inconsistent throughout the genus. The (–)-enantiomers are largely the major for β-pinene and for linalool, however. There are too few data to draw conclusions regarding the other chiral monoterpenoid components.
Table 4. Enantiomeric distribution of chiral monoterpenoid components in Salvia species.
Salvia species | Component Enantiomeric Distribution, (+) : (–) | Ref. |
| |||||
α-Thujene | α-Pinene | Camphene | β-Pinene | α-Phellandrene | Limonene |
| ||
Salvia dorrii a | 70.7 : 29.3 | 60.6 : 39.4 | 27.8 : 72.2 | 41.4 : 58.6 | 100.0 : 0.0 | 57.2 : 42.8 | This work |
|
Salvia albimaculata | - | - | - | - | - | 68.5 : 31.5 | [29] |
|
Salvia aramiensis | - | - | - | - | - | - | [29] |
|
Salvia aucheri var. aucheri | - | - | - | - | - | - | [29] |
|
Salvia aucheri var. canescens | - | - | - | - | - | - | [29] |
|
Salvia aytachii | - | - | - | - | - | - | [29] |
|
Salvia bracteata | - | 93.2 : 6.8 | - | 9.5 : 90.5 | - | - | [29] |
|
Salvia cryptantha | - | - | - | - | - | - | [29] |
|
Salvia fruticosa | - | - | - | - | - | - | [29] |
|
Salvia lavandulifolia | 69.1 : 30.9 | 56.4 : 43.6 | 44.0 : 56.0 | 34.0 : 66.0 | - | 78.0 : 22.0 | [21] |
|
Salvia leucantha | - | 4.3 : 95.7 | - | - | - | - | [30] |
|
Salvia microstegia | - | - | - | - | - | - | [29] |
|
Salvia multicaulis | - | - | - | - | - | - | [29] |
|
Salvia nemorosa | 0.0 : 100.0 | 32.3 : 67.7 | - | 15.2 : 84.8 | - | 36.7 : 63.3 | [31] |
|
Salvia palaestina | - | - | - | - | - | - | [29] |
|
Salvia pisidica | - | - | - | - | - | - | [29] |
|
Salvia potentillifolia | - | 5.6 : 94.4 | - | 3.9 : 96.1 | - | - | [29] |
|
Salvia sclarea | - | 10.2 : 89.8 | - | 4.5 : 95.5 | - | 68.3 : 31.7 | [32] |
|
Salvia tchitcheffi | - | - | - | - | - | - | [29] |
|
Salvia tomentosa | - | 37.7 : 62.3 | - | 8.0 : 92.0 | - | - | [29] |
|
Salvia trichoclada | - | - | - | - | - | - | [29] |
|
Salvia viridis | - | - | - | - | - | - | [29] |
|
Salvia wiedemannii | - | 97.5 : 2.5 | - | 13.5 : 86.5 | - | - | [29] |
|
β-Phellandrene | Linalool | Camphor | Terpinen-4-ol | Borneol | α-Terpineol |
| ||
Salvia dorrii a | 99.3 : 0.7 | 13.5 : 86.5 | 99.2 : 0.8 | 50.5 : 49.5 | 37.3 : 62.7 | 95.1 : 4.9 | This work |
|
Salvia albimaculata | - | - | - | - | - | - | [29] |
|
Salvia aramiensis | - | - | 4.7 : 95.3 | - | - | - | [29] |
|
Salvia aucheri var. aucheri | - | - | 5.9 : 94.1 | - | - | - | [29] |
|
Salvia aucheri var. canescens | - | - | 17.8 : 82.2 | - | - | - | [29] |
|
Salvia aytachii | - | - | 75.1 : 24.9 | - | - | - | [29] |
|
Salvia bracteata | - | - | - | - | - | - | [29] |
|
Salvia cryptantha | - | - | 7.0 : 93.0 | - | - | - | [29] |
|
Salvia fruticosa | - | - | 48.2 : 51.8 | - | - | - | [29] |
|
Salvia lavandulifolia | - | 15.3 : 84.7 | 87.2 : 12.8 | 61.3 : 38.7 | 35.9 : 65.0 | 58.1 : 41.9 | [21] |
|
Salvia leucantha | - | - | - | - | - | - | [30] |
|
Salvia microstegia | - | 52.4 : 47.6 | - | - | - | - | [29] |
|
Salvia multicaulis | - | 17.2 : 82.8 | - | - | - | - | [29] |
|
Salvia nemorosa | - | - | - | - | - | - | [31] |
|
Salvia palaestina | - | 17.8 : 82.2 | - | - | - | - | [29] |
|
Salvia pisidica | - | - | 95.9 : 4.1 | - | - | - | [29] |
|
Salvia potentillifolia | - | - | - | - | - | - | [29] |
|
Salvia sclarea | - | 23.7 : 76.3 | - | - | - | - | [32] |
|
Salvia tchitcheffi | - | - | 20.8 : 79.2 | - | - | - | [29] |
|
Salvia tomentosa | - | - | 93.1 : 6.9 | - | 100.0 : 0.0 | - | [29] |
|
Salvia trichoclada | - | 12.4 : 87.6 | - | - | - | - | [29] |
|
Salvia viridis | - | 32.8 : 67.2 | - | - | - | - | [29] |
|
Salvia wiedemannii | - | - | 22.9 : 77.1 | - | - | - | [29] |
|
a Averages |
4. Conclusions
This is the first report on the essential oil composition of Salvia dorrii var. incana. However, this preliminary report is based on only four individuals collected from the same habitat in southeastern Oregon. The essential oil showed variation not only in quantitative composition, but also in enantiomeric distribution. In addition, there is wide variation in the enantiomeric distribution of chiral terpenoid components within the Salvia genus. It is apparent that additional research is needed on S. dorrii essential oils from other geographical locations within its natural range, particularly on other infraspecific taxa, in order to further define the volatile phytochemical characteristics of this species.
Authors’ contributions
Conceptualization, W.N.S.; Methodology, A.P., P.S., W.N.S.; Software, P.S.; Validation, W.N.S., Formal analysis, A.P., W.N.S.; Investigation, K.S. A.P., P.S., W.N.S.; Resources, P.S., W.N.S.; Data curation, W.N.S.; Writing – original draft preparation, W.N.S.; Writing – review & editing, K.S., A.P., P.S., W.N.S.; Project administration, W.N.S.
Acknowledgements
This work was carried out as part of the activities of the Aromatic Plant Research Center (APRC, https://aromaticplant.org/).
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency.
Availability of data and materials
All data will be made available on request according to the journal policy.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. | World Flora Online, W.F.O. Salvia L. Available online: http://www.worldfloraonline.org/taxon/wfo-4000033888 (accessed on Jan 26, 2025). |
2. | Kamatou, G.P.P.; Makunga, N.P.; Ramogola, W.P.N.; Viljoen, A.M. South African Salvia species: A review of biological activities and phytochemistry. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 119, 664–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2008.06.030. |
3. | Fu, Z.; Wang, H.; Hu, X.; Sun, Z.; Han, C. The pharmacological properties of Salvia essential oils. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2013, 3, 122–127. https://doi.org/10.7324/JAPS.2013.3723. |
4. | Sharifi-Rad, M.; Ozcelik, B.; Altın, G.; Daşkaya-Dikmen, C.; Martorell, M.; Ramírez-Alarcón, K.; Alarcón-Zapata, P.; Morais-Braga, M.F.B.; Carneiro, J.N.P.; Alves Borges Leal, A.L.; et al. Salvia spp. plants-from farm to food applications and phytopharmacotherapy. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 80, 242–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2018.08.008. |
5. | Asgarpanah, J. A review on the essential oil chemical profile of Salvia genus from Iran. Nat. Volatiles Essent. Oils 2021, 8, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.37929/nveo.852794. |
6. | Rhind, J.P. Essential Oils: A Comprehensive Handbook for Aromatic Therapy; Singing Dragon: London, UK, 2020; ISBN 978-1787752290. |
7. | Strachan, J.L. A revision of the Salvia dorrii complex (Lamiaceae). Brittonia 1982, 34, 151–169, https://doi.org/10.2307/2806368. |
8. | Pavek, P.L.S. Purple Sage: Salvia dorrii (Kellogg) Abrams; USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service: Pullman, Washington, USA, 2010. |
9. | Moerman, D.E. Native American Ethnobotany; Timber Press, Inc.: Portland, Oregon, USA 1998; ISBN 978-0-88192-453-4. |
10. | Ahmed, A.A.; Mohamed, A.E.-H.H.; Karchesy, J.; Asakawa, Y. Salvidorol, a nor-abietane diterpene with a rare carbon skeleton and two abietane diterpene derivatives from Salvia dorrii. Phytochem. 2005, 67, 424–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2005.12.009. |
11. | Strachan, J.L.; Reveal, J.L. On the typification of Salvia dorrii (Lamiaceae). Gt. Basin Nat. 1981, 41, 198–200. |
12. | Turner, M.; Gustafson, P. Wildflowers of the Pacific Northwest; Timber Press, Inc.: Portland, Oregon, USA, 2006; ISBN 978-0-88192-745-0. |
13. | New York Botanical Garden, N.Y.B.G. C. V. Starr Virtual Herbarium Available online: http://sweetgum.nybg.org/science/vh/specimen-list/?SummaryData=Salvia dorrii (accessed on May 20, 2024). |
14. | Satyal, P.; Dosoky, N.S.; Poudel, A.; Swor, K.; Setzer, W.N. Chemical composition of the aerial parts essential oil of Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus from southwestern Idaho. J. Essent. Oil Plant Comp. 2023, 1, 115–121, https://doi.org/10.58985/jeopc.2023.v01i02.16. |
15. | van den Dool, H.; Kratz, P.D. A generalization of the retention index system including linear temperature programmed gas-liquid partition chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 1963, 11, 463–471, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(01)80947-X.Adams, R.P. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry, 4th ed.; Allured Publishing: Carol Stream, Illinois, USA, 2007; ISBN 978-1-932633-21-4. |
16. | Mondello, L. FFNSC 3; Shimadzu Scientific Instruments: Columbia, Maryland, USA, 2016. |
17. | NIST20; National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA, 2020. |
18. | Satyal, P. Development of GC-MS Database of Essential Oil Components by the Analysis of Natural Essential Oils and Synthetic Compounds and Discovery of Biologically Active Novel Chemotypes in Essential Oils, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL, USA, 2015. |
19. | Craft, J.; Satyal, P.; Setzer, W. The chemotaxonomy of common sage (Salvia officinalis) based on the volatile constituents. Medicines 2017, 4, 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines4030047. |
20. | Dosoky, N.S.; Poudel, A.; Satyal, P.; Setzer, W.N. Volatile composition and enantiomeric distribution of Spanish sage (Salvia officinalis subsp. lavandulifolia [Vahl] Gams) from Spain. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2022, 17, 1934578X221139402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578X221139402. |
21. | Kim, T.; Song, B.; Cho, K.S.; Lee, I.-S. Therapeutic potential of volatile terpenes and terpenoids from forests for inflammatory diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2187. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21062187. |
22. | Liu, J.; Liu, X.; Xiong, X.; Zheng, Y.; Rao, R.; Li, W. Protective effect of 1,8-cineole (eucalyptol) on respiratory system: A systematic review and meta-analysis from animal studies. Pharmacogn. Mag. 2024, 09731296241296202. https://doi.org/10.1177/09731296241296202. |
23. | Galan, D.M.; Ezeudu, N.E.; Garcia, J.; Geronimo, C.A.; Berry, N.M.; Malcolm, B.J. Eucalyptol (1,8-cineole): An underutilized ally in respiratory disorders? J. Essent. Oil Res. 2020, 32, 103–110, https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2020.1716867. |
24. | Hoch, C.C.; Petry, J.; Griesbaum, L.; Weiser, T.; Werner, K.; Ploch, M.; Verschoor, A.; Multhoff, G.; Bashiri Dezfouli, A.; Wollenberg, B. 1,8-Cineole (eucalyptol): A versatile phytochemical with therapeutic applications across multiple diseases. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2023, 167, 115467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115467. |
25. | Michalsen, A.; Goldenstein, K.; Kardos, P.; Klimek, L.; Palm, J.; Parganlija, D.; Stöckl, J. The impact of cineole treatment timing on common cold duration and symptoms: Non-randomized exploratory clinical trial. PLoS One 2024, 19, e0296482. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296482. |
26. | Laude, E.A.; Morice, A.H.; Grattan, T.J. The antitussive effects of menthol, camphor and cineole in conscious Guinea-pigs. Pulm. Pharmacol. 1994, 7, 179–184. https://doi.org/10.1006/pulp.1994.1021. |
27. | Gavliakova, S.; Dolak, T.; Licha, H.; Krizova, S.; Plevkova, J. Cineole, thymol and camphor nasal challenges and their effect on nasal symptoms and cough in an animal model. Acta Medica Martiniana 2013, 13, 5–13. https://doi.org/10.2478/acm-2013-0012. |
28. | Demirci, B.; Tabanca, N.; Başer, K.H.C. Enantiomeric distribution of some monoterpenes in the essential oils of some Salvia species. Flavour Fragr. J. 2002, 17, 54–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/ffj.1039. |
29. | Villalta, G.; Salinas, M.; Calva, J.; Bec, N.; Larroque, C.; Vidari, G.; Armijos, C. Selective BuChE inhibitory activity, chemical composition, and enantiomeric content of the essential oil from Salvia leucantha Cav. collected in Ecuador. Plants 2021, 10, 1169. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10061169. |
30. | Swor, K.; Poudel, A.; Satyal, P.; Setzer, W.N. Essential oil composition of Salvia nemorosa cv. “May Night” cultivated in Kuna, Idaho. Am. J. Essent. Oils Nat. Prod. 2025, 13, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.22271/23219114.2025.v13.i1a.266. |
31. | Lorenzo, D.; Paz, D.; Davies, P.; Villamil, J.; Vila, R.; Cañigueral, S.; Dellacassa, E. Characterization and enantiomeric distribution of some terpenes in the essential oil of a Uruguayan biotype of Salvia sclarea L. Flavour Fragr. J. 2004, 19, 303–307. https://doi.org/10.1002/ffj.1282. |

This work is licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution
4.0
License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Abstract
Salvia
dorrii (purple sage) is an understudied member of Salvia
that inhabits the western United States, but has traditional medicinal
importance to native peoples throughout its native range. The purpose of this
study is to examine the essential oil composition of four Salvia dorrii
var. incana samples collected from plants growing in southeastern
Oregon. The essential oils were obtained from aerial parts by hydrodistillation
and analyzed by gas chromatography, including enantioselective gas
chromatography. The major components in the essential oils were 1,8-cineole
(20.4-37.0%), bornyl acetate (5.2-19.2%), (–)-(E)-β-caryophyllene
(3.3-12.4%), α-bisabolol (3.0-8.8%), α-pinene (3.1-5.5%, predominantly
(+)-α-pinene), β-phellandrene (0.1-9.8%, predominantly (+)-β-phellandrene), and
camphor (0.5-7.5%, predominantly (+)-camphor). This report is the first
investigation of S. dorrii var. incana essential oil. The work is
preliminary, however, and additional research is needed on other S. dorrii
infraspecific taxa and from other geographical locations.
Abstract Keywords
Purple sage, gas chromatography, enantiomers, chiral.

This work is licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution
4.0
License (CC BY-NC 4.0).

Editor-in-Chief

This work is licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
License.(CC BY-NC 4.0).