Research Article
Jacob Bulenga Lisuma*
Jacob Bulenga Lisuma*
Corresponding
Author
Research
Department, Tobacco Research Institute of Tanzania (TORITA), Box 431, Tabora,
Tanzania.
E-mail:
jacob.lisuma@torita.or.tz,jbulenga@gmail.com,
Tel: +255 787 166 493, +255755 504 506
Elimboto Ibrahim Muna
Elimboto Ibrahim Muna
Research Department, Tobacco Research Institute of Tanzania (TORITA), Box 431, Tabora, Tanzania.
E-mail: elimboto.ibrahim@torita.or.tz, elimboto2017@gmail.com
Geofrey Vicent Gama
Geofrey Vicent Gama
Research Department, Tobacco Research Institute of Tanzania (TORITA), Box 431, Tabora, Tanzania.
E-mail: geofrey.gama@torita.or.tz
Rogath Peter Kisoka
Rogath Peter Kisoka
Training & Technology Transfer Dept, Tobacco Research Institute of Tanzania (TORITA), Box 431, Tabora, Tanzania.
E-mail: rogath.kilosa@torita.or.tz, rogathkisoka@gmail.com
Elly Simon Maerere
Elly Simon Maerere
Research Department, Tobacco Research Institute of Tanzania (TORITA), Box 431, Tabora, Tanzania.
E-mail: elly.maerere@torita.or.tz, ellymaerere@gmail.com
Joel Loitu Meliyo
Joel Loitu Meliyo
Agronomic Research and Technology Transfer Dept, Itracom Fertilizer Ltd P.O Box 1299 Dodoma, Tanzania.
E-mail: joelmeliyo15@gmail.com
Kenneth Francis Masuki
Kenneth Francis Masuki
Agronomic Research and Technology Transfer Dept, Itracom Fertilizer Ltd P.O Box 1299 Dodoma, Tanzania. E-mail: kennymasuki@gmail.com
Elias Niyongabo
Elias Niyongabo
Agronomic Research and Technology Transfer Dept, Itracom Fertilizer Ltd P.O Box 1299 Dodoma, Tanzania. E-mail: eliasnniyongabo@gmail.com
Macédoine Nsabiyumva
Macédoine Nsabiyumva
Agronomic Research and Technology Transfer Dept, Itracom Fertilizer Ltd P.O Box 1299 Dodoma, Tanzania. E-mail: nsabmac1132@gmail.com
Catherine Senkoro
Catherine Senkoro
Agronomic Research and Technology
Transfer Dept, Itracom Fertilizer Ltd P.O Box 1299 Dodoma, Tanzania.
E-mail: cathysenkoro@gmail.com
Received: 2026-01-10 | Revised:2026-01-31 | Accepted: 2026-02-02 | Published: 2026-03-06
Pages: 30-37
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58985/jafsb.2026.v04i01.89
Abstract
A study was conducted in selected tobacco-producing areas in
Tanzania to evaluate the impact of Fertilisants Organo Minéraux (FOMI),
organo-mineral fertilizers on soil pH and soil organic carbon (SOC) levels
after harvesting the tobacco crop K326 from the three sites of Tumbi-Tabora,
Mtanila-Chunya and Ushetu-Shinyanga in the 2023/24 cropping season. The
experiment involved eight treatments: an unfertilized control; standard NPK fertilizers
at 500 kg ha-1 and CAN at 133 kg ha-1; FOMI SUPA applied
at 1000, 800, and 600 kg ha-1 on day 7, combined with FOMI CANS at 133,
83, and 67 kg ha-1 on day 21; and FOMI GREEN at 650, 517, and 383 kg
ha-1 on day 7, combined with FOMI NENEPESHA at 233, 183, and 133 kg
ha-1 on day 21. The results showed that all FOMI fertilizers improved
soil pH at all application rates without significant differences between them
and also significantly (p =0.05) improved the SOC content. FOMI
fertilizers for the first time, increased soil pH by 0.07 units and organic
carbon content by 0.01%. Thus, the application of organo-mineral FOMI
fertilizers significantly enhanced SOC levels, with more pronounced effects
observed in acidic soils and at higher application rates, highlighting their
potential to improve soil fertility and promote long-term soil health.
Therefore, this study recommends promoting the use of organo-mineral FOMI
fertilizers in acidic soils, owing to their capacity to ameliorate soil acidity
and enhance SOC, thereby supporting long-term soil health and sustainable
agricultural productivity.
Keywords
Soil pH, soil organic carbon, soil health, tobacco, FOMI fertilizers.
1. Introduction
Soil is the key to agriculture and has a significant
connection to the survival of human beings, hence it accounts for a useful
resource for the development of any nation when soil is tillaged for crop
production [1]. Inorganic fertilization is an important measure in agricultural
production, as it improves soil nutrients for increased crop yield [2, 3]. However, prolonged application of inorganic
fertilizers may lead to nutrient imbalance, reduce organic matter and have negative
effects on the soil by increasing soil acidity (H+) a by-product of
nitrification. [4, 5]. Soil pH plays a
critical role in influencing the biological, chemical, and physical properties
of soil that determine plant growth and productivity [3].
The interactions between soil pH and biological, geological, and chemical processes,
such as fertilizer application, can alter soil pH through these interconnected
systems.
Tanzania's tobacco sector has been importing inorganic fertilizers
for tobacco, over seven decades [6] with a value
of over 56,147,770 US$. Researchers have found that long-term use of inorganic fertilizers
alone degrades soil organic matter, makes the soil more acidic, and pollutes
the environment by causing heavy metals to, accumulate which lowers the quality
and health of the soil [7-10]. However, other
researchers have found that a combination of inorganic and organic fertilizers
can enhance soil health [11]. Recently, the
use of organo-mineral fertilizers has become popular in the fertilizer industry
to combine organic and inorganic fertilizers and rock resources to improve soil
health and fertility. Researchers have also linked it to improved mineral
nutrient use efficiency [12,13].
The concept of organic culture emerged from the promotion of
organic fertilizers to counteract the negative effects of chemical fertilizers [14,15]. Organic fertilizers include compost,
farmyard manure, bacterial biofertilizers, or plant growth-promoting
rhizobacteria (PGPR). Returning organic amendments to the field can alleviate
soil problems, improve soil components by increasing soil organic matter, and
improve soil fertility to a certain extent [15].
This advantage could be due to the fact that organic materials in the organo-mineral
fertilizers contain a significant amount of organic matter and functional
microorganisms, which can effectively transform nutrients in the soil [14]. However, it's important to note that many of
these microorganisms may not be cultivable.
Organomineral fertilizers improve soil physical properties,
reduce soil acidity, improve soil bulk density, increase water infiltration
rate, increase soil porosity and aeration, reduce nutrient leaching, and
increase SOC. By boosting the amount of organic carbon, humus content of the
soil increases altering the biological characteristics of the soil, and fostering
the growth of beneficial macro- and microorganisms. This, in turn, improves
soil fertility and boosts crop productivity, while utilizing eco-friendly and
economical methods [13].
Prolonged reliance on inorganic NPK
fertilizers in tobacco-growing areas of Tanzania has intensified soil
acidification and nutrient depletion, posing a significant challenge to soil
fertility sustainability given the high nutrient demands of tobacco [16]. Thus, organo-mineral fertilizers offer a
promising alternative for improving soil fertility and soil health [14]. The Fertilisants Organo Minéraux (FOMI), an organomineral fertilizer is produced by the International
Trading Company (ITRACOM) Fertilizers Ltd in Tanzania. These organo-mineral
fertilizers included basal fertilizers FOMI GREEN (N10P14K11)
and FOMI SUPA (N5P9K12) and top-dressing
fertilizers FOMI NENEPESHA (N11P0K22) and FOMI
CANS (N18P0K1) respectively. Therefore, the
objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of FOMI organo-mineral
fertilizers on soil pH and soil organic matter and its potential in enhancing
soil health for the sustainability of tobacco production in the cropping season
2023/24.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Description of the experimental sites
The selected soil characteristics (nutrients) of the experimental sites are presented in Table 1. During the 2024–25 cropping season, field experiments were carried out at the Tumbi site, in the Tabora region, Ushetu in Shinyanga and Mtanila, in Chunya-Mbeya. The Tumbi site located at 5°3'41.96772" S, 32°40'13.07892" E; 1168 m a.s.l in Tabora District had a mean atmospheric temperature and rainfall of 29 °C and 1050 mm, respectively; Ushetu, located at 4°7'15.76488" S, 32°16'7.61664" E, 1,153 m a.s.l in Shinyanga region had mean atmospheric temperature and rainfall of 25 °C and 890 mm, respectively. Mtanila located at 7°54'26.02044" S, 33°19'21.8226" E, 1,368 m a.s.l. in Chunya Mbeya region had a mean atmospheric temperature and rainfall of 24 °C and 750 mm, respectively. Table 1 lists the specific soil characteristics of the experimental location. The Tobacco Research Institute of Tanzania's (TORITA) K326 tobacco seed variety was used.
Table 1.
Some soil physical-chemical characteristics before the experiment.
|
S/No |
Parameter |
Unit |
Ushetu-Shinyanga |
Tumbi-Tabora |
Mtanila- Chunya |
|
1 |
OC |
% |
0.18 |
0.18 |
0.21 |
|
2 |
pH (water) |
- |
5.17 |
5.11 |
5.09 |
|
3 |
Total N |
% |
0.02 |
0.02 |
0.02 |
|
4 |
Avail P |
mg kg-1 |
7.99 |
6.57 |
5.00 |
|
5 |
Exch K |
cmol+kg-1 |
0.40 |
0.45 |
0.42 |
|
6 |
Exch Ca |
cmol+kg-1 |
0.40 |
0.42 |
0.59 |
|
7 |
Texture
class |
- |
Loamy
sand |
Loamy
sand |
Sandy
loam |
2.2. Soil samples analysis prior to the experiment
A zigzag method for soil sampling to a depth of 0-30 cm a using
soil auger was adopted across the sites to make a composite sample at each site
before the trial and at each plot to make a composite sample after the trial.
The soil composite samples were used to determine the soil pH using a soil
water ratio of 1:2.5, SOC by the Walkley Black method, total N was determined by
the Kjedahl method, available P by the Bray-1 method, and exchangeable Ca, and K
estimated by atomic adsorption spectrophotometer [17].
The sown tobacco seeds (K326) were sourced from TORITA in a
1.5 m wide and 20 m deep seedbed. The seedlings were raised in a seedbed of 1.5
x 20 m and fertilized with 5 kg NPK for basal application as per the treatments
given below. Eight weeks after sowing, the seedlings were transplanted to the
experimental plots at a spacing of 1.2 m between ridges and 0.50 m between
plants, making a total of 24 plants per plot of size 4.8 m x 3 m, equivalent to
a population of 16,666 plants/ha. The tests were set up in a randomized
complete block design with eight treatments, with 4 replications, at the 3
sites. The standard basal fertilizer was composed of NPK (10:18:24) + 0.5MgO + 3CaO
+ 7S+0.012B and its topdressing fertilizer which composed of CAN 27%N + 1.7MgO +
3CaO + 3S. The FOMI SUPA basal fertilizer composed of NPK (5:9:12) + 3CaO + 1MgO
+ 4S + 0.01B and its topdressing FOMI CANS fertilizer composed of NPK 19:0:1) +
3CaO + 2MgO + 4S. The FOMI GREEN basal fertilizer was composed of NPK
(10:14:11) +7CaO+1MgO and its topdressing FOMI NENEPESHA composed of NPK
(11:0:22) + 4CaO + 2MgO. Table 2 shows the rates and times of application of both
basal and topdressing fertilizers in each treatment.
Table 2.
Experimental treatments across the sites.
|
No. |
Basal
and Topdressing Fertilizers |
Basal
rate at 7 DAT |
Topdressing
rate at 21 DAT |
|
1. |
UNFERTILIZED |
0
kg ha-1 |
0
kg ha-1 |
|
2. |
STANDARD (ST) + CAN (CN) |
500
kg ha-1 N10P18K24 |
133
kg ha-1 CAN27%N |
|
3. |
FOMI SUPA (FS) +
FOMI CANS (FC) |
1000
kg ha-1 N5P9K12 |
133
kg ha-1 N18P0K1 |
|
4. |
FOMI SUPA (FS) +
FOMI CANS (FC) |
800
kg ha-1 N5P9K12 |
83
kg ha-1 N18P0K1 |
|
5. |
FOMI SUPA (FS) +
FOMI CANS (FC) |
600
kg ha-1 N5P9K12 |
67
kg ha-1 N18P0K1 |
|
6. |
FOMI GREEN (FG) + FOMI NENEPESHA (FN) |
650
kg ha-1 N10P14K11 |
233
kg ha-1 N11P0K22 |
|
7. |
FOMI GREEN (FG) + FOMI NENEPESHA (FN) |
517
kg ha-1 N10P14K11 |
183
kg ha-1 N11P0K22 |
|
8. |
FOMI GREEN (FG) + FOMI NENEPESHA (FN) |
383
kg ha-1 N10P14K11 |
133
kg ha-1 N11P0K22 |
|
DAT = Days after transplanting tobacco seedlings. |
|||
Throughout the experiments, the experimental plots were kept
weed-free and pesticides were applied only after counting the number of pests
present. Confidor was used at the rate of 10g L-1 of water as a
pesticide used across the sites. Tobacco plants were topped, followed by the
application of Yamaotea Super 305 EC at the rate of 8 mls 10 L-1 of
water as a sucker.
The data collected across sites were analysed using a two factors analysis of variance (ANOVA). The analysis covered the different rates of two basal FOMI organo-mineral fertilizers, as well as their top-dressed counterparts. The STATISTICA 8th Edition, (StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA), was used. Significant means were compared using Fisher’s least significant difference at p = 0.05
3.1. Effect of organo-mineral FOMI fertilizer on soil pH
The application of organo-mineral FOMI fertilizer reduced soil acidity. Before applying FOMI fertilizers, the soil pH for the Ushetu-Shinyanga site was 5.17 (Table 1), after the trial, it was 5.18 ± 0.00, indicating a reduction in soil acidity by 0.01 unit for two application seasons. The soil pH for Tumbi-Tabora following the application of organic FOMI fertilizers reduced pH by 0.03 units, while the soil pH for the Mtanila-Chunya site reduced by 0.07 units. This indicates that the use of organo-mineral FOMI fertilizers results in a favourable response by reducing the soil pH, as shown in Table 3 and Fig. 1, due to additional organic content in the soil. Similar results were observed in other studies [14] and [15]. The more acidic the soil, the greater the change in pH due to the use of organo-mineral FOMI fertilizers (Fig. 2).
Figure 1. Effect of organic FOMI fertilizers on soil pH across the sites.
The treatment results indicated that the standard fertilizer N10P18K24 (T2) did not improve the soil pH and did not differ from the absolute treatment (T1), which did not receive any fertilizer. However, all the organic fertilizers FOMI SUPA (N5P9K12), FOMI CANS (N18P0K1), FOMI GREEN (N10P14K11), and FOMI NENEPESHA (N11P0K22) (T3-T8) increased soil pH significantly (p =0.05) compared to the standard fertilizer (T2). The improvement of soil pH could be attributed to the calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) oxides content combined in FOMI fertilizers. Therefore, the long-term application of organo-mineral FOMI fertilizers could alleviate soil acidity in tobacco-growing areas in the future. Other studies have also observed a similar trend for long-term application of organic fertilizers with Ca and Mg oxides for improving soil acidity [18-21].
3.2. Effect of organo-mineral FOMI fertilizer on SOC
The application of FOMI fertilizer at the Mtanila-Chunya site resulted in a significantly high content of SOC of 0.21 ± 0.00% (Table 3). The Tumbi-Tabora site showed a slight increase in SOC by 0.01% to 0.19 ± 0.00%. The SOC for the Ushetu-Shinyanga site, was the lowest in comparison to Mtanila-Chunya and Tumbi-Tabora (Fig. 2). The inherent levels of SOC could have been attributed to the improvement in SOC. The standard treatment (T2) applied with standard NPK (10:18:24) at the rate of 500 kg ha-1 and top-dressed with CAN 27%N (133 kg ha-1), did not improve the SOC, similar to the unfertilized treatment (T1). The application of basal fertilizer at a higher rate of 1000 kg ha-1 FOMI SUPA and top-dressed with 133 kg ha-1 FOMI CANS resulted in a significant increase in SOC, probably due to the nature of the soil that was not too (p =0.05) improve the SOC (0.21 ± 0.00%). The SOC level dropped to 0.20 ± 0.00% with a basal application rate of 800 kg ha-1 and top-dressing rate of 83 kg ha-1. This did not differ significantly from the treatment that used 650 kg ha-1 of FOMI GREEN for the base and 233 kg ha-1 of FOMI NENEPESHA for top-dressing. These results show that organo-mineral FOMI fertilizers enhanced SOC more than the standard fertilizer.
Table 3. Effect of application of FOMI fertilizers on soil pH, and SOC.
Sites | Soil pH | Soil OC (%) |
Mtanila-Chunya | ||
Tumbi-Tabora | ||
Ushetu-Shinyanga | ||
Treatments | ||
T1 - Unfertilized | ||
T2 - 500 kg ha-1 ST+133 kg ha-1 CN | 5.12 ± 0.01 b | 0.18 ± 0.00 e |
T3 - 1000 kg ha-1 FS+133 kg ha-1 FC | 5.18 ± 0.01 a | |
T4 – 800 kg ha-1 FS+83 kg ha-1 FC | 5.18 ± 0.01 a | |
T5 – 600 kg ha-1 FS+67 kg ha-1 FC | 0.19 ± 0.00 c | |
T6 – 650 kg ha-1 FG+233 kg ha-1 FN | 5.18 ± 0.01 a | 0.20 ± 0.00 b |
T7 - 517 kg ha-1 FG+183 kg ha-1 FN | 5.18 ± 0.01 a | |
T8 - 383 kg ha-1 FG+133 kg ha-1 FN | 5.17 ± 0.01 a | 0.19 ± 0.00 c |
2-WAY ANOVA F-statistics | ||
Site (S) | 19*** | 109.43*** |
Treatment (T) | 16*** | 27.88*** |
S x T | 3*** | 1.22ns |
Means in the same category of evaluated interface sharing similar letter(s) do not differ significantly based on their respective Standard error (SE) at a 5% error rate. Values presented are means ± SE x̅ (Standard error of means); *** means significant at P < 0.001
Figure 2. Impact of organo-mineral FOMI fertilizers on soil acidity and its pH change.
Organo-mineral fertilizers are known to be beneficial for the recycling and preservation of SOC in soils. FOMI fertilizers are composed of organic functional groups enriched with oxidized and aliphatic carbon [22]. These different C species of mineral surfaces enhance the chemical composition of SOC bound in surfaces and become stable in organo-mineral. Through this mechanism, FOMI organo-mineral fertilizers are beneficial for the recycling and preservation of organic carbon in soils. Thus, the use of higher rates of FOMI organo-mineral fertilizer (1000 kg ha-1) indicated an increase in the accumulation of organic carbon in the soil. This is a very crucial soil property, especially in these areas where SOC is naturally low [16]. Similar to the sites that naturally had low SOC content (Table 1). The application of FOMI organo-mineral fertilizers has also been indicated to keep or maintain its SOC (Fig. 3; Table 3). However, there was a slight improve in the SOC at the Tumbi-Tabora site (Fig. 3, Table 3), indicating that prolonged use of FOMI organo-mineral fertilizer not only preserved but also improved the SOC. The organic carbon derived from organic matter (OM) in FOMI has the potential to provide agronomic value, contributing to fertilizer use efficiency and soil environmental conservation [23]. Thus, FOMI organo-mineral fertilizers have been observed to produce higher crop yields in comparison to the conventional fertilizers [24, 25].
Figure 3. Impact of organic FOMI fertilizers in preserving/improving SOC.
These results indicate that the application of organic FOMI fertilizers enhanced and improved the soil pH, and preserved SOC. Similar studies have shown a slight improvement in soil pH and enhanced SOC due to the use of organo-mineral fertilizers [26, 27]. The enhancement of SOC is important for increasing crop yields and quality, as organic carbon is key for conserving the equilibrium of agricultural ecosystems [28] as it improves soil health, nutrient storage and availability to plants and soil pH [20, 29] which is a very important parameter for soil nutrient availability.
Therefore, this study established that the use of FOMI organo-mineral fertilizer in tobacco improves soil pH and SOC, which is in agreement with another study [30] that indicated that organic fertilizer improves organic carbon in soils. Additionally, recent research on the use of organic fertilizers in tobacco crops [31-35] has demonstrated that increasing SOC contributes to better soil health. Other studies have shown that organo-mineral fertilizers can improve the physical, chemical, and biological properties of soil, which helps plants grow by releasing nutrients at the right time [36]. Our study recommends long-term research to further study the impact of organo-mineral fertilizers not only to soil pH and organic carbon, but also for soil-plant nutrient interactions and soil microbial diversities.
The results demonstrated that the application of organo-mineral FOMI fertilizers had a positive effect on soil chemical properties by slightly reducing soil acidity and enhancing SOC content. Compared with standard mineral fertilizers, the use of FOMI fertilizer for the first time, increased soil pH by 0.07 units and the organic carbon content by 0.01%. FOMI fertilizers were more effective in improving SOC, with stronger responses observed in more acidic soils and at higher application rates, indicating their potential for improving soil fertility and long-term soil health.
Based on the study findings, the following recommendations are proposed. First, organo-mineral FOMI fertilizers should be promoted as an alternative to conventional mineral fertilizers, particularly in acidic soils, due to their ability to reduce soil acidity and improve SOC. Second, the appropriate application rates of FOMI fertilizers should be optimized and adopted by farmers to maximize improvements in SOC and sustain long-term soil fertility and productivity. Finally, for more comprehensive results, further research is needed to evaluate the effects of organo-mineral fertilizers on soil pH, SOC, and nutrient interactions between soil and plants, as well as the composition and diversity of microbial communities.
Disclaimer (artificial intelligence)
Author(s) hereby state that no generative AI tools such as Large Language Models (ChatGPT, Copilot, etc.) and text-to-image generators were utilized in the preparation or editing of this manuscript.
Authors’ contributions
Conceptualization, research design and formal analysis, organization of trials in three sites, data curation, funding acquisition, manuscript write-up, review, editing, reading, and approval of the final manuscript, J.L; research design, investigation, supervision, manuscript review, manuscript write-up, review, editing, reading, and approval of the final manuscript, E.M,; methodology development, supervision of casual laborers, data collection, data entry and analysis, review of manuscript, reading and approval of the final manuscript, G.G.; R.K., E.M.; formulation of organomineral fertilizers, monitoring trials, agronomic activities, review, editing, reading, and approving the final manuscript, J.M., K.M., E.N., M.N., C.S.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the International Trading Company (ITRACOM) of Dodoma, Tanzania, for the provision of FOMI organomineral fertilizers for the research trials at Tabora, Chunya, and Ushetu and their collaboration with the Tobacco Research Institute of Tanzania (TORITA) in the research and formulation of organomineral fertilizers. Acknowledgements are further extended to the TORITA for supervision, providing researchers and technical staff to prepare this manuscript in collaboration with ITRACOM researchers.
Funding
Research fund for this research was funded by grants from International Trading Company (ITRACOM) located in Dodoma, Tanzania through code 3001- DO3S. The open access funding was also funded by ITRACOM
Availability of data and materials
All data will be made available on request according to the journal policy.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare to have no conflict of interest regarding this paper publication. No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
References
1. | |
2. | Chen, X.P.; Cui, Z.L.; Fan, M.S.; Vitousek, P.; Zhao, M.; Ma, W.Q.; Wang, Z.L.; Zhang, W.J.; Yan, X.Y.; Yang, J.C.; Deng, X.P.; Gao, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Guo, S.W; Ren, J.; Li, S.Q; Ye, Y.L.; Wang, Z.H.; Huang, J.L.; Tang, Q.Y.; Sun, Y.X.; Peng, X.L.; Zhang, J.W.; He, M.R; Zhu, Y.J.; Xue, J.Q.; Wang, G.L; Wu, L.; An, N.; Wu, L.Q; Ma, L.; Zhang, W.F.; Zhang, F.S. Producing more grain with lower environmental costs. Nature. 2014, 514(7523), 486–489. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13609 347 |
3. | Ibrahim, A.; Abaidoo, R.C.; Fatondji, D.; Opoku, A. Hill placement of manure and fertilizer micro-dosing improves yield and water use efficiency in the Sahelian low input millet-based cropping system. Field Crops Res. 2015, 180, 29–349 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.04.022 |
4. | Hartmann, M.; Frey, B.; Mayer, J.; Mder, P.; Widmer, F. Distinct soil microbial diversity under long-term organic and conventional farming. ISME. 2014, 9, 1177–1194. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.210 |
5. | Yang, Y.; Wang, P.; Zeng, Z. Dynamics of bacterial communities in a 30-year fertilized paddy field under different organic-inorganic fertilization strategies. Agronomy. 2019, 9(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9010014 |
6. | Muna, E.; Lisuma, J.; Gama, G.; Maerere, E.; Kisoka, R.; Ndayiragije, S.; Masuki, K.; Nniyongabo, E.; Nduwimana, N.; Senkoro, C.; Meliyo, J. The influence of FOMI fertilizers on the yield and quality of flue cured tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) in Tanzania. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2025, 21(9), 699-709. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2025.16977 |
7. | Roba, T.B. Review on: The effect of mixing organic and inorganic fertilizer on productivity and soil fertility. Open Access Lib. J. 2018, 5(06), p.1. |
8. | Jiang, D.; Hengsdijk, H.; Ting-Bo, D.A.I.; Qi, J.I.N.G.; Wei-Xing, C.A.O. Long-term effects of manure and inorganic fertilizers on yield and soil fertility for a winter wheat-maize system in Jiangsu, China. Pedosphere. 2006, 16(1), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(06)60022-2 |
9. | Dutta, D.; Singh, V.K.; Upadhyay, P.K.; Meena, A.L.; Kumar, A.; Mishra, R.P.; Dwivedi, B.S.; Shukla, A.K.; Yadav, G.S.; Tewari, R.B.; Kumar, V. Long‐term impact of organic and inorganic fertilizers on soil organic carbon dynamics in a rice‐wheat system. Land Degrad. Dev. 2022, 33(11), 1862-1877. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.4267 |
10. | Jote, C.A. The impacts of using inorganic chemical fertilizers on the environment and human health. Org. Med. Chem. Int. J. 2023, 13, 555864. https://doi.org/10.19080/OMCIJ.2023.13.555864 |
11. | Kumar, A.; Chandel, N.; Barkha, B. Organic farming vs. integrated nutrient management: A comparative review of agricultural productivity and sustainability. Int. J. Plant Soil Sci. 2024, 36(6), 460-473. https://doi.org/10.9734/IJPSS/2024/v36i64648 |
12. | Smith, W.B.; Wilson, M.; Pagliari, P. Organomineral fertilizers and their application to field crops in Animal Manure: Production, Characteristics, Environmental Concerns, and Management (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd). 229–244, 2020. |
13. | Bouhia, Y.; Hafidi, M.; Ouhdouch, Y.; Boukhari, M.E.M.E.; Mphatso, C.; Zeroual, Y.; Lyamlouli, K. Conversion of waste into organo-mineral fertilizers: current technological trends and prospects. Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio/Technol. 2022, 21(2), 425-446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-022-09619-y |
14. | Singh, T.B.; Ali, A.; Prasad, M.; Yadav, A.; Shrivastav, P.; Goyal, D.; Dantu, P.K. Role of organic fertilizers in improving soil fertility. Contaminants in agriculture: sources, impacts and management. 2020, 61-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41552-5_3 |
15. | Michael, P.S. Role of organic fertilizers in the management of nutrient deficiency, acidity, and toxicity in acid soils–A review. J. Global Agric. Ecol. 2021, 12(3), 19-30. |
16. | Shelukindo, H.B.; Msanya, B.M.; Mwango, S.B.; Semu, E.; Munishi, P.; Singh, B. Characterization of some typical soils of the miombo woodland ecosystem of Kitonga Forest Reserve, Iringa, Tanzania: physico-chemical properties and classification. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2014; 4(3), 35. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09360-4_17 |
17. | Moberg, J.R. Soil and Plant Analysis Manual; The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Chemistry Department: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2000. |
18. | Wang, S.; Hu, K.; Feng, P.; Qin, W.; Leghari, S.J. Determining the effects of organic manure substitution on soil pH in Chinese vegetable fields: A meta-analysis. J. Soil Sediment. 2023, 23(1), 118-130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-022-03330-9 |
19. | Zhang, N.; Chen, X.; Wang, J.; Dong, H.; Han, X.; Lu, X.; Yan, J.; Zou, W. Anthropogenic soil management performs an important role in increasing soil organic carbon content in northeastern China: A meta-analysis. Agric. Ecosys. Environ. 2023, 350, 108481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2023.108481 |
20. | Liang, D.; Ning, Y.; Ji, C.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, H.; Ma, H.; Zhang, J.; Wang, J. Biochar and manure co-application increases rice yield in low productive acid soil by increasing soil pH, organic carbon, and nutrient retention and availability. Plants. 2024, 13(7), 973. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13070973 |
21. | Mutai, J.C.; Medvecky, B.; Vanek, S.J.; Gikonyo, E.W.; Ojiem, J.O.; Fonte, S.J. Long-term organic matter inputs enhance soil health and reduce soil-borne pathogen pressure in maize-bean rotations in Kenya. Agric. Ecosys. Environ. 2025, 380, 109402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2024.109402 |
22. | Jones, E.; Singh, B. Organo-mineral interactions in contrasting soils under natural vegetation. Front. Environ. Sci. 2014, 2, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2014.00002 |
23. | Ramírez–Palacios, R.; Acevedo-Restrepo, I.; Restrepo–Sánchez, N.; Peláez, C. Development and evaluation of a slow-release occluded fertilizer employing functionalized biosolids as a support matrix. Plants, 2025, 14(20), 3154. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14203154 |
24. | Crusciol, C.A.C.; Campos, M.D.; Martello, J.M.; Alves, C.J.; Nascimento, C.A.C.; Pereira, J.C.D.R.; Cantarella, H. Organomineral fertilizer as source of P and K for sugarcane. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10(1), p.5398. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62315-1 |
25. | Kaboneka, S.; Kwizera, C.; Nijimbere, S.; Irakoze, W.; Nsengiyumva, P.; Ndihokubwayo, S.; Habonimana, B. Direct and residual fertilizer values of maize (Zea mays L.) stover co-composted with Tithonia diversifolia (Hemsl.) A. Gray green manure. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Res. Eng. 2021, 7(7), 6-17. https://doi.org/10.31695/IJASRE.2021.34042 |
26. | Yan, F.; Schubert, S.; Mengel, K. Soil pH increase due to biological decarboxylation of organic anions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1996, 28(4-5), 617-624. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(95)00180-8 |
27. | Zhang, J.; Wu, X.; Shi, Y.; Jin, C.; Yang, Y.; Wei, X.; Mu, C.; Wang, J. A slight increase soil pH benefits soil organic carbon and nitrogen storage in a semi-arid grassland. Ecol. Indicat. 2021, 130, 108037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108037 |
28. | Ou, Y.; Rousseau, A.N.; Wang, L.; Yan, B. Spatio-temporal patterns of soil organic carbon and pH in relation to environmental factors—A case study of the Black Soil Region of Northeastern China. Agric. Ecosys. Environ. 2017, 245, 22-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.05.003 |
29. | Wang, C.; Kuzyakov, Y. Soil organic matter priming: The pH effects. Global Change Biol. 2024, 30(6), e17349. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17349 |
30. | Kumari, M.; Sheoran, S.; Prakash, D.; Yadav, D.B.; Yadav, P.K.; Jat, M.K. Long-term application of organic manures and chemical fertilizers improve the organic carbon and microbiological properties of soil under pearl millet-wheat cropping system in North-Western India. Heliyon. 2024, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25333 |
31. | Meng, Z.H.A.N.G.; Zhen, Z.H.A.I.; Taibo, L.I.A.N.G.; Huaxin, D.A.I.; Yanling, Z.H.A.N.G. Characteristics of soil organic carbon constituents and their effects on chemical components in tobacco leaves from Henan tobacco-planting areas. Tobacco Sci. Technol. 2022, 55(1). https://doi.org/10.16135/j.issn1002-0861.2021.0079 |
32. | Zhai, X.; Zhang, L.; Wu, R.; Wang, M.; Liu, Y.; Lian, J.; Munir, M.A.M.; Chen, D.; Liu, L.; Yang, X. Molecular composition of soil organic matter (SOM) regulate qualities of tobacco leaves. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12(1), 15317. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19428-6 |
33. | Li, H.; Hu, Z.; Wan, Q.; Mu, B.; Li, G.; Yang, Y. Integrated application of inorganic and organic fertilizer enhances soil organo-mineral associations and nutrients in tea garden soil. Agronomy. 2022, 12(6), 1330. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12061330 |
34. | Chen, D.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, G.; Dai, K.; Li, J.; Song, X.; Xu, Y.; Cui, Y.; Yang, X. Biochar-based organic fertilizer application promotes the alleviation of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) continuous cropping obstacles by improving soil chemical properties and microbial community structure. BMC Plant Biol. 2025, 25(1), p.271. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-025-06266-7 |
35. | Yan, S.; Wang, P.; Cai, X.; Wang, C.; Van Zwieten, L.; Wang, H.; Yin, Q.; Liu, G.; Ren, T. Biochar-based fertilizer enhanced tobacco yield and quality by improving soil quality and soil microbial community. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2025, 37, 103964. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-025-06266-7 |
36. | Srinivasarao, C.; Naik, M.R.; Naorem, A.; Chandana, M.; Baral, K. Organo-Mineral Fertilizers for Sustainable Agriculture. Indian J. Fertilise. 2024, 20(4), 366-383. https://doi.org/10.1088/2977-3504/adc0a8 |
This work is licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution
4.0
License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Abstract
A study was conducted in selected tobacco-producing areas in
Tanzania to evaluate the impact of Fertilisants Organo Minéraux (FOMI),
organo-mineral fertilizers on soil pH and soil organic carbon (SOC) levels
after harvesting the tobacco crop K326 from the three sites of Tumbi-Tabora,
Mtanila-Chunya and Ushetu-Shinyanga in the 2023/24 cropping season. The
experiment involved eight treatments: an unfertilized control; standard NPK fertilizers
at 500 kg ha-1 and CAN at 133 kg ha-1; FOMI SUPA applied
at 1000, 800, and 600 kg ha-1 on day 7, combined with FOMI CANS at 133,
83, and 67 kg ha-1 on day 21; and FOMI GREEN at 650, 517, and 383 kg
ha-1 on day 7, combined with FOMI NENEPESHA at 233, 183, and 133 kg
ha-1 on day 21. The results showed that all FOMI fertilizers improved
soil pH at all application rates without significant differences between them
and also significantly (p =0.05) improved the SOC content. FOMI
fertilizers for the first time, increased soil pH by 0.07 units and organic
carbon content by 0.01%. Thus, the application of organo-mineral FOMI
fertilizers significantly enhanced SOC levels, with more pronounced effects
observed in acidic soils and at higher application rates, highlighting their
potential to improve soil fertility and promote long-term soil health.
Therefore, this study recommends promoting the use of organo-mineral FOMI
fertilizers in acidic soils, owing to their capacity to ameliorate soil acidity
and enhance SOC, thereby supporting long-term soil health and sustainable
agricultural productivity.
Abstract Keywords
Soil pH, soil organic carbon, soil health, tobacco, FOMI fertilizers.
This work is licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution
4.0
License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Editor-in-Chief
This work is licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
License.(CC BY-NC 4.0).