Research Article
Ismaeel Ridwan Olanrewaju
Ismaeel Ridwan Olanrewaju
Corresponding
Author
Department of Chemistry, Faculty
of Physical Sciences, University of Ilorin, P.M.B. 1515, Ilorin, Nigeria
E-mail: Ismaeel.ro@unilorin.edu.ng;
ridwanlanre@gmail.com
Tel: +2348069315518
Usman Lamidi Ajao
Usman Lamidi Ajao
Department of Chemistry, Faculty
of Physical Sciences, University of Ilorin, P.M.B. 1515, Ilorin, Nigeria
Abstract
Oxidative stress has been linked to neurological diseases.
The menace of stress is clinically curtailed by using synthetic drugs whose
usage is associated with several draw backs. Recently, essential oils have
shown promising antioxidant potential devoid of any side effect. The potential
is a function of the type of phytochemicals whose presence in the oil varies
from plant to plant. It is on this basis that this study investigated the
antioxidant potential of characterized essential oil from rhizomes of Nigerian
grown Cyperus rotundus. Rhizomes (500 g) of C. rotundus were pulverized and hydrodistilled for three hours. The
hydrodistillation afforded 0.125±0.02% (w/w) of essential oil. Gas
Chromatography (GC) and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) were used
to characterize the oil and the characterization revealed abundance of
sesquiterpenoids (85.9%). Major compounds in the oil were α-humulene (14.3%),
caryophyllene oxide (12.3%), humulene-1,2-epoxide (9.1%), valencene (8.2%),
β-selinene (7.9%), β-caryophyllene (6.5%) and γ-gurjunene epoxide (5.4%). The antioxidant
potential of the oil was established using radical scavenging assay. The oil
showed antioxidant activity by scavenging free radicals of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl
(DPPH) with IC50 of 32.60 μg/mL. Although the oil was not as active as butylated
hydroxytoluene (BHT, IC50 of 18.12 μg/mL) that was used as standard,
its activity revealed that it could serve as alternative to synthetic drugs to
ameliorate the menace of oxidative stress after clinical approval.
Keywords
1. Introduction
Recently, men have witnessed several neurogenic diseases
such as memory loss, Alzheimer, Parkinson, amyotrophic lateral and multiple
sclerosis depression. The development of these diseases has been linked to
oxidative stress, caused by excess free radicals in the cell. The damage caused
by reactive oxygen species is restored by antioxidants which convert the free
radicals generated in the body cells into less harmful substances, thereby
curtailing the menace of oxidative stress [1-3]. Commonly
used antioxidants are butylated hydroxyl-toluene (BHT), butylated
hydroxyl-anisole (BHA), tert-butylated hydroxyquinone (TBHQ) among others [4]. These are synthetic drugs and their high
dosages are reported to be responsible for the carcinogenesis of human cells as
well as DNA and liver damages [5-7]. As a
result of this, there is a need for alternative antioxidants from natural
sources with little or no side effects.
Plants produce phytochemicals that have been explored as
phytomedicines since ancient times. These phytochemicals are secreted in
certain organs and are derived from all parts of plants [8,9]. Cyperus rotundus
also known as nut-grass or nutsedge is a perennial plant belonging to the
family of Cypereacea. The plant is
commonly known as “eso koriko”, “ayaa ayaa”, “ayaare”, “ahihia ahihia”, and
“isholo i toho” by the Yorubas, Hausas, Fulfulde, Igbos and TIVs people of
Nigeria respectively [10]. The plant is used
in ethnomedicine for the treatment of stomach disorders, cancers, dysmenorrhea,
mensural irregularities, blood disorders, leprosy, dysentery, spasms and
inflammatory diseases [11,12]. Crude
extracts from the plant have been reported to possess antifungal,
anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic, antimalarial, antiviral, antibacterial, antidiarrheal,
and antioxidant properties that justify its usage in ethnomedicine [12-14]. Phytochemical screening of extracts from
various parts of the plant revealed the presence of terpenoids, polyphenols,
saponins, alkaloids, flavonoids, and furochromes [15]. The
presence of polyphenols and terpenoids were reported to be responsible for the
antioxidant property of the extracts [15].
Essential oil extracted from rhizomes of the plant growing
in different parts of the world has been characterized and compositional
differences were established. Characterization of rhizome essential oils of the
plant grown in two locations (Empangeni and KwalDlangezwa) in the KwaZulu Natal
province of South Africa revealed the abundance of α-cyperone, myrtenol, and
β-pinene [16]. Saperene, α-cyperone, and
α-selinene were the most prominent constituents identified from the rhizome oil
of the plant native to China [17]. The oil
of the Brazilian grown C. rotundus contained cyperotundone, and
α-cyperene as the principal constituents, while α-cyperene and cyperone
predominated the rhizome oils of the plant indigenous to Tunisia and Nigeria [18–20]. Meanwhile, valerenal, cyperene, trans-pinocarveol,
α-copaene, and caryophyllene oxide were the major compounds that constituted
the rhizome oil of the plant native to India [21]. These
phytochemical variations might be due to differences in agroclimatic conditions
at different locations of the plant.
The antioxidant activity of rhizome essential oil of C.
rotundus of Tunisia and China origin have been explored [17, 22]. However, to the best of our knowledge,
the antioxidant activity of the rhizome oil of the plant grown in north-central
Nigerian has not been studied. This study therefore aimed at characterizing and
evaluating antioxidant potential of rhizome essential oil of C. rotundus
growing in north-central Nigeria.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Sample collection
Fresh
rhizomes of C. rotundus (2500 g) were
harvested at the Park and Garden, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria.
Identification of the plant was carried out by Mr. Bolu, at the Herbarium of
Plant Biology Department, University of Ilorin, where voucher specimens were
deposited [UILH/003/0679].
2.2. Essential oil extraction
Rhizomes
(500 g) of C. rotundus were blended
and hydrodistilled for 3 hours in a Clevenger setup, based on British
Pharmacopoeia specification [23]. The
extraction was carried out in triplicate. The oils were collected, preserved in a sealed sample tube and
stored under refrigeration at 4 oC until the analyses were carried
out.
2.3. Gas Chromatography – Mass Spectrometry
(GC/MS) analysis of the oil
An Agilent
19091S gas chromatograph coupled with a quadruple focusing mass spectrometer
433HP-5 mass detector was used. Helium was used as the carrier gas at a flow
rate of 1.5 mL/min; all analyses were performed at constant flow. The GC was
fitted with a 30 m by 0.25 mm fused silica capillary column coated with phenyl
methyl siloxane at a split ratio of 1:50. The film thickness was 0.25 µm. The oven
temperature was initially kept at 100 oC for 5 min. Afterwards, 150 oC at a
rate of 4 oC/min. for 8 min. and to 250 oC at a rate of 20 oC/min. Mass
detector conditions were as follows: Transfer line temperature at 300 oC,
ionization mode electron impact at 70 eV. The percentage composition of the oil
was computed in each case from GC peak areas. The identification of the
components was done based on comparison of retention indices.
2.4. Identification of constituents in the oil
The
identification of the constituents in the oil was based on (i) comparison of
their retention indices (RI), calculated using a homologous series of n-alkanes
(C7–C30, Supelco Bellefonte, PA, USA) under identical experimental conditions,
co-injection with standards and compared with those data from Wiley 275 and
NIST 08 libraries (ii) comparison of fragmentation pattern in the mass spectra
of each constituent with those data from Wiley 275 and NIST 08 libraries [24-27].
The relative quantity of each constituent was calculated based on peak area of
the GC (FID response) without using a correction factor.
2.5. DPPH
antioxidant assay of the oil
The antioxidant
potential of the oil was measured in terms of its hydrogen-donating or radical
scavenging ability against DPPH, using the method reported by Ilhami, [28]. In the method,
2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl, DPPH, solution (1.5 mL of 10-4 M, in
95% ethanol) was mixed with the oil (1.5 mL) at various concentrations
(12.5-200 µg/mL) in ethanol. Each of the mixtures was shaken thoroughly and
incubated in the dark for 30 minutes at ambient temperature. The control was
prepared using the same procedure without the oil. The absorbance of the solution was measured
at 517 nm using UV-spectrophotometer (UV-550; Jasco Inc., Japan). The assay was
carried out in triplicate and the results were expressed as mean values ±
standard deviation. The concentration of the oil that gave 50 % inhibition (IC50)
was calculated from the graph of percentage inhibition against the oil
concentration. Butylated hydroxyl-toluene (BHT) was used as standard. The
percentage inhibitions were calculated using the equation (1):
where, A0 is
the absorbance of the control sample (containing all reagents except the test
compound) and AT is the absorbance of the test samples.
2.6. Statistical
analysis
Tests were carried out in triplicates. The
mean values were calculated from the three values. The data for various
biochemical parameters were expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3) and compared using one-way analysis
of variance (ANOVA) test, followed by Dunnett multiple comparison tests with equal sample size test. Values
were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. The IC50
values were calculated by non-linear regression analysis from the mean values.
Statistics were done using SPSS for Windows version 10.
3. Results and discussion
Hydrodistillation of the blended
rhizome of C. rotundus yielded 0.125
± 0.02%(w/w) of essential oil. The yield was lower when compared to the yields
of essential oils from rhizomes of the plant grown in two different locations,
Empangeni (0.20%) and KwaDlangezwa (0.16%), in South Africa [16]. Similarly, higher oil yields of 2.9% and
1.8% were obtained from rhizomes of the plant harvested from Elrahad and Bano
parts of the north Kordofan state of Elobeid [29]. The
lower oil yield from this study might be due to unfavorable environmental
conditions in north-central Nigeria as compared to South Africa and Elobeid. Table
1 shows the percentage composition, identities and retention indices of
constituents of rhizome essential oil of C.
rotundus.
Table 1. Chemical composition of rhizome essential oil of Cyperus rotundus
|
Compounds |
Composition
(%) |
RIa |
RIb |
Mass
Spectra Data |
|
|
1 |
α-Copaene |
3.0 |
1221 |
1221 |
93,105,119,133,147 |
|
2 |
α-Cyperene |
0.8 |
1398 |
1396 |
69,91,105,119,147 |
|
3 |
β-Caryophyllene |
6.5 |
1418 |
1418 |
69,93,105,133, 204 |
|
4 |
γ-Gurjunene
epoxide |
5.4 |
1474 |
1474 |
67,81,95,110,122 |
|
5 |
β-Selinene |
7.9 |
1485 |
1479 |
81,93,105,121,133 |
|
6 |
Valencene |
8.2 |
1491 |
1484 |
119,133,147,161,175 |
|
7 |
α-Bulnesene |
0.6 |
1505 |
1505 |
204,133,119, 93, 79 |
|
8 |
α-Calamenene |
0.6 |
1521 |
1498 |
133,147,161,179,189 |
|
9 |
α-Humulene |
14.3 |
1554 |
1552 |
204, 121, 93, 80,67 |
|
10 |
Caryophyllene
oxide |
12.3 |
1581 |
1580 |
220, 109, 79, 69, 41 |
|
11 |
Humulene-1,2-epoxide |
9.1 |
1606 |
1607 |
43,55,67,81,96 |
|
12 |
Cubenol |
1.9 |
1642 |
1641 |
119,133,147,161,204 |
|
13 |
β-Eudesmol |
2.7 |
1649 |
1648 |
204, 149, 93, 59, 55 |
|
14 |
t-Cadinol |
0.9 |
1653 |
1653 |
105,119,161,189,204 |
|
15 |
Aristolone |
2.8 |
1756 |
1752 |
77,119,161,175, 218 |
|
16 |
Nootkatone |
2.9 |
1800 |
1789 |
119,132,147,161,175 |
|
17 |
Pentadecanoic
acid |
3.1 |
1878 |
1869 |
60,73,85,98,115 |
|
18 |
Stearic
acid |
4.6 |
2141 |
2139 |
43,60,73,85,98 |
|
19 |
Oleic
acid |
4.0 |
2175 |
2144 |
55,69,83,97,123 |
|
|
Compound
Classes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydrocarbon
Sesquiterpenoids |
41.9 |
|
|
|
|
Oxygenated
Sesquiterpenoids |
44.0 |
||||
|
Non-terpenoids |
11.7 |
||||
|
|
Total |
97.6 |
|
|
|
|
Compounds
are listed in order of elution from fused silica capillary column coated on
CP-Sil 5; RIa = Literature Retention Indices, RIb =
Calculated Retention Indices, Bolded name = Chemotype. |
|||||
The Table showed nineteen compounds
which represented 97.6% of the total oil volume. Oxygenated sesquiterpenoids
(44.0%) were the major class of compounds in the oil while hydrocarbon
monoterpenoids constituted 41.9% of the oil. Humulene-1,2-epoxide (9.1%),
β-caryophyllene (6.5%), γ-gurjunene epoxide (5.4%), β-selinene (7.9%),
valencene (8.2%), α-humulene (14.3%), and caryophyllene oxide (12.3%) were the
principal constituents in the oil. Other major compounds in the oil include α-copaaene
(3.0%), cubenol (1.9%), β-eudesmol (2.7%), aristolone (2.8%), nootkatone
(2.9%), pentadecanoic acid (3.1%), stearic acid (4.6%), and oleic acid (4.0%).
Compounds that were detected in significant amounts were α-cyperene (0.8%), α-bulnesene
(0.6%), α-calamenene (0.6%), and t-cadinol
(0.9 %).
The rhizome essential oils of the plant
indigenous to South Africa and China were of myrtenol chemotype [16,17].
Isologifolen-5-one and cyperene were the chemotypes of the oils of the plant
native to Kordofan, Elobeid, and New Delhi, India, respectively [29, 30]. The predominant of α-humulene revealed
that the oil of this study was of α-humulene chemotype. The chemotypic
variation of rhizome essential oil from C.
rotundus could be linked to differences in agroclimatic conditions of
different locations in the world where the plant is grown.
Synthases of the most predominant
monoterpenoids and sesquiterpenoids have been established to aid the
biosynthesis of terpenic compounds that constitute essential oil [31-33]. The process involves transformation of
the terpenoid precursors to various cationic intermediates followed by their
deprotonation or hydration to terminate the process. The biosynthesis of all
sesquiterpenoids identified in the essential oil from rhizome of this plant, was
facilitated by α-humulene synthase. The rhizome essential oils of the plant
grown in Empageni and KwaDlangezwa of KwaZulu, Natal Province of South Africa
on the other hand contained monoterpenoids (whose biosynthesis was facilitated by
myrtenol and β-pinene synthases respectively) that were not identified in this
studied [16]. The absence of monoterpenoids
in the oil could be attributed to the inactiveness of monoterpene synthases due
to unfavourable agroclimatic conditions of north-central, Nigeria.
Caryophyllene oxide and α-selinene synthases catalyzed the biosynthesis of
sesquiterpenoids in the oils of the plant native to Empageni and KwaDlangezwa
respectively. The synthases aided the formation of β-selinene, α-copaene,
β-caryophyllene, α-humulene, caryophyllene oxide, humulene epoxide, and
nootkatone. The compounds were of lower quantities compared to their quantities
in the oil of this study. The higher quantities of the compounds in this oil
showed that the agroclimatic conditions of this location favoured the activity
of α-humulene synthase, thereby producing the above listed compounds in higher
amounts.
Qualitatively, γ-gurjunene, valencene,
α-bulnesene, α-calamenene, cubenol, β-eudesmol, and t-cadinol that
constituted the oil were not identified in the oils of South African origin.
Similarly, α-cyperone, caryophellenol-11, vulgarol,
caryophella-3,8(13)-dien-5-β-ol, patchenol, α-selinene, allo-aromadendrene,
and β-elemene that were constituents of the oils from the plant native to South
Africa were not detected in this oil. This qualitative variation is
attributable to differences in environmental conditions of the two countries
that subsequently influenced the activities of the synthases in the plant.
The rhizome oil showed antioxidant
activity by scavenging DPPH radicals. The activity of the oil was concentration
dependent and increased steadily with increasing concentration and a 50%
inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 32.60 μg/mL was determined [Fig. 1]. The IC50
value of the oil revealed that the oil was a weaker antioxidant as compared to
the activity of BHT (IC50 = 18.12 μg/mL) that was used as reference
drug. Antioxidant activity of caryophyllene oxide, β-caryophyllene, and α-humulene
have been reported [34-36]. The antioxidant
activity of the oil in this study could be linked to the presence of
β-caryophyllene, caryophyllene oxide, and α-humulene in the oil.
Figure 1. DPPH
radical scavenging activity of rhizome essential oil of Cyperus rotundus
and BHT.
4. Conclusions
The essential oil was isolated from
rhizomes of C. rotundus and characterized. The characterization revealed
abundance of sesquterpenoids most notably α-humullene, humulene-1,2-epoxide,
β-caryophyllene, caryophyllene epoxide, valencene and β-selinene. The oil
showed moderate antioxidant activity when compared to the activity of butylated
hydroxy toluene that was used as standard. The oil could therefore be used to
curtail the menace of oxidative stress after clinical trials.
Authors’ contributions
Conceptualization, Methodology,and
Writing of Original Draft: IRO; Methodology, Writing-review, and Editing: ULA.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge
Mr. Bolu at the Herbarium of the department of Plant Biology, University of
Ilorin, who assisted in the plant identification.
Funding
There was no grant from
any funding agency for the research.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declared that there is no conflict of interest
in this manuscript.
References
1.
Chemsa, A.E.; Boulechfar, S.; Zellagui,
A.; Bensouici, C.; Segueni, N.; Lahlouel, M.; Ozturk, M.; Duru, M.E.
Investigation of antioxidant and anticholinesterase potential of essential oil
and methanol extract of Propolis from Mila region. J. Bio. Act. Prod. Nat.
2019, 9(6), 434-444.
2.
Liguori, I.; Russo, G.; Cursio, F.;
Bulli, G.; Aran, L.; Della-Morte, D.; Gargiulo, G.; Tesla, G.; Cacciatore, F.;
Bonaduce, D. et al. Oxidative stress, aging and diseases. Clin. Interv. Aging.
2018, 13, 757-772.
3.
Usman, L.A.; Ismaeel, R.O. Chemical
composition and antioxidant potential of fruit essential oil of Laggera
pterodonta (DC.) Benth grown in North-central, Nigeria. J. Bio. Act. Prod. Nat.
2020, 10(5), 405 – 410
4.
Ahmed S.R.; Roy R.; Romi, I.J.; Hassan,
M.; Bhuiyan, K.H.; Khan, M.M.H. Phytochermical screening, antioxidant and
antibacterial activity of some medicinal plants grown in Sylhet Region.
IOSR-JPBS. 2019, 4(1), 26 – 37.
5.
Kornienko, J.S.; Smirnova, L.S.;
Pugovkina, N.A.; Ivanova, J.S.; Shilina, M.A.; Grinchuk, T.M.; Shatrova, A.N.;
Aksenov, N.D.; Zenin, V.V.; Nikolsky, N.N. High doses of synthetic antioxidants
induce premature senescence in cultivated mesenchymal stem cells. Sci. Rep. 2019,
9, 1296.
6.
Saad, B.; Sing, Y.Y.; Nawi, M.A.;
Hashim, N.; Mohamedi, A.; Saleh, M.I.; Sulaiman, S.F.; Talib, K. et al.
Determination of synthetic phenolic antioxidants in food items using
reversed-phase HPLC. Food Chem. 2009, 105, 389 – 394.
7.
Bungau, S.G.; Tit, D.M. Antioxidant
activity of essential oils. Antioxidants. 2023, 12, 383 – 385
8.
Santhiravel, S.; Bekhit, A.A.; Mendis,
E.; Jacobs, J.L.; Dunshea, F.R.; Rajapakse, N.; Ponnampalam, E.N. The impact of
plant phytochemicals on the gut microbiota of humans for a balanced life. Int.
J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(15), 8124.
9.
Prasad, K.N.; Xie, H.H.; Hao, J.; Yang,
B.; Qiu, S.; Wei, X.; Chen, F.; Jiang, Y. Antioxidant and anticancer activities
of 8-hydroxypsoralen isolated from wampee (Clausena lansium (Lour.) Skeels)
peels. Food Chem. 2010, 118(1), 62 – 66.
10.
Iwu, M.M. Handbook of African Medicinal
Plants. CRP Press, BOC Raton, Florida, 1993.
11.
Srinivasulu, D.; Kandikattu, H.K.;
Amruta, N.; Khanum, F.; Narayana, V. Review on Cyperus rotundus: Ancient weed
to modern Elixir of life phytochemistry and therapeutic uses of Cyperus
rotundus (Mustaka). Pharm. Biomed. Res. 2021, 7(4), 221–250.
12.
Peerzada, A.M.; Ali, H.H.; Naeem, M.;
Latif, M.; Hussain, B.; Tanveer, A. Cyperus rotundus L.: Traditional uses,
phytochemistry, and pharmacological activities. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015, 174,
540 – 560.
13.
Dang, G.K.; Parekar, R.R.; Kamat, S.K.;
Scindia, A.M.; Rege, N.N. Antiinflammatory activity of Phyllanthus emblica, Plumbago
zeylanica and Cyperus rotundus in acute models of inflammation. Phytother. Res.
2011, 25(6), 904 – 908.
14.
Sabir, M.N.; Saour, K.Y.; Rachid, S. In
vitro cytotoxic and antimicrobial effects of a novel peroxysesquiterpene
glucoside from the rhizomes of Cyperus rotundus L (Cyperaceae). Trop. J. Pharm.
Res. 2020, 19(2), 331 – 339.
15.
Sharma, A.; Verma, R.; Ramteke, P. Cyperus
rotundus: A potential novel source of therapeutic compound against urinary
tract pathogens. J. Herb. Med. 2014, 4(2), 74 – 82.
16.
Oyedeji, O.A.; Lawal, O.A. Chemical
composition of the essential oils of Cyperus rotundus L. from South Africa.
Molecules. 2009, 14, 2909 – 2917.
17.
Hu, Q.; Cao, X.; Hao, D.; Zhang, L.
Chemical composition, antioxidant, DNA damage protective, cytotoxic and
antibacterial activities of Cyperus rotundus rhizomes essential oil against
foodborne pathogens. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 45231.
18.
Ekundayo, O.; Oderinde, R.; Ogundeyin,
M.; Biskup, E.S. Essential oil constituents of Cyperus tuberosus Rottb.
Rhizomes. Flav. Flagr. J. 2005, 6, 261 – 264.
19.
Kilani, S.; Abdelwahed, A.; Chraief, I.;
Ben Ammar, R.; Hayder, N.; Hammami, M.; Ghedira, K.; Chekir-Ghedira, L.
Chemical composition, antibacterial and antimutagenic activities of essential
oil from (Tunisian) Cyperus rotundus. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2005, 17, 695 – 700.
20.
Zoghbi, M.D.G.B.; Andrade, E.H.A.;
Carreira, L.M.M.; Rocha, E.A.S. Comparison of the main components of the
essential oils of “Priprioca”. Cyperus articulates var. articulates L., C.
articulates var. nodosus L., C. prolixus Kunth and C. rotundus L. J. Essent.
Oil Res. 2008, 20, 42 – 46.
21.
Jirovetz, L.; Wobus, A.; Buchnauer, G.;
Shafi, M.P.; Thampi, P.I. Comparative analysis of the essential oil and
SPME-headspace aroma compounds of Cyperus rotundus L. roots/tubers from
South-India using GC, GC-MS and olfactometry. J. Essent. Oil-Bearing Plants.
2004, 7, 100 – 106.
22.
Bouzouita, N.; Essaidi, I.; Koubaier,
H.B.H.; Snoussi, A.; Casabianca, H.; Chaabouni, M.M. Chemical composition of Cyperus
rotundus L. tubers essential oil from the South of Tunisia, antioxidant
potentiality and antibacterial activity against foodborne pathogens. J. Essent.
Oil-Bearing Plants. 2014, 7(3), 522 – 532
23.
British pharmacopoeia II, (1980). pp.
109, HM, stationary office, London
24.
Jennings, W.; Shibamoto, T. Qualitative
analysis of flavor volatiles by gas capillary chromatography. Academic press,
New York. 1980, pp. 68 – 109.
25.
Joulain, D.; Koenig W.A. The atlas of
spectra data of sesquiterpene hydrocarbon. E.B. Verlay Hamburg, Germany. 1998, pp.112
– 153.
26.
Adams, R.P. Identification of essential
oil components by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. Allured publ.
corp., Carol Stream, IL. USA. 2012. ISBN: 978-1-932633-21-4.
27.
Usman, L.A.; Agboola, T.A.; AbdulWaheed,
J.O.; Ismaeel, R.O.; Ogundele, V.A.; Ibrahim, A. Phytochemical profile of fruit
and leaf essential oils of Thuja orientalis grown in North central Nigeria.
NJPAS. 2016, 29(2), 2968 – 2976.
28.
Ilhami, G. Antioxidant activity of
L-adrenaline: A structure activity insight. Chem-Biol. Interact. 2009,
179(2-3), 71-80.
29.
Eltayeib, A.A.; Ismaeel H.U. Extraction
of Cyperus Rotundus Rhizomes Oil, Identification of Chemical Constituents and
Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity of the Oil in North Kordofan State. Int.
J. Adv. Res. Chem. Sci. 2014, 1(9), 18 – 29.
30.
Richa, T.; Suneet, K. Chemical constituents
of the essential oil of Cyperus rotundus Lnn. Int. J. Drug Dev. Res. 2014,
6(2), 57-60.
31.
Usman, L.A.; Oguntoye, O.S.; Ismaeel,
R.O. Effect of seasonal variation on chemical composition, antidiabetic and
antioxidant potentials of leaf essential oil of Eucalyptus globulus L. J.
Essent.-Oil Bearing Plants. 2020, 23(6), 1314-1323.
32.
Trapp, S.C.; Cruteau, R.B. Genomic
organization of plant terpene synthases and molecular evolutionary
implications. Genetics. 2001, 158, 811 – 832.
33.
Degenhardt, J.; Koller, T.G.;
Gershenzon, J. Monoterpene and sesquiterpene synthases and the origin of
terpene skeletal diversity in plants. Phytochemistry. 2009, 70, 1621–1637.
34.
Ahmad, F.; Sirat, H.M.; Kammil, M.F.;
Salleh, W.H. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of essential oil and
extracts of Piper miniatum. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2015, 10(11), 2005 – 2008.
35.
Majid, M.; Khan, M.R.; Sha, N.A.; UI
Haq, I.; Farooq, M.A.; Ullah, S.; Sharif, A.; Zahra, Z.; Younis, T.; Sajid, M.
Studies on phytochemical, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and analgesic
activities of Euphorbia dracunculoides. BMC Complement Altr. Med. 2015, 7(15),
349
36.
Gunawan, I.W.G.; Bawa Putra, A.A.;
Widihati, A.G. The response to oxidative stress α-humulene compounds Hibiscus
manihot L. Leaf on the activity of 8-hydroxy-2-deoksiquanosin levels pancreatic
β-cells in diabetic rats. Biomed. Pharmacol. J. 2016, 9(2), 7259.
This work is licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution
4.0
License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Abstract
Oxidative stress has been linked to neurological diseases.
The menace of stress is clinically curtailed by using synthetic drugs whose
usage is associated with several draw backs. Recently, essential oils have
shown promising antioxidant potential devoid of any side effect. The potential
is a function of the type of phytochemicals whose presence in the oil varies
from plant to plant. It is on this basis that this study investigated the
antioxidant potential of characterized essential oil from rhizomes of Nigerian
grown Cyperus rotundus. Rhizomes (500 g) of C. rotundus were pulverized and hydrodistilled for three hours. The
hydrodistillation afforded 0.125±0.02% (w/w) of essential oil. Gas
Chromatography (GC) and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) were used
to characterize the oil and the characterization revealed abundance of
sesquiterpenoids (85.9%). Major compounds in the oil were α-humulene (14.3%),
caryophyllene oxide (12.3%), humulene-1,2-epoxide (9.1%), valencene (8.2%),
β-selinene (7.9%), β-caryophyllene (6.5%) and γ-gurjunene epoxide (5.4%). The antioxidant
potential of the oil was established using radical scavenging assay. The oil
showed antioxidant activity by scavenging free radicals of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl
(DPPH) with IC50 of 32.60 μg/mL. Although the oil was not as active as butylated
hydroxytoluene (BHT, IC50 of 18.12 μg/mL) that was used as standard,
its activity revealed that it could serve as alternative to synthetic drugs to
ameliorate the menace of oxidative stress after clinical approval.
Abstract Keywords
This work is licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution
4.0
License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Editor-in-Chief
This work is licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
License.(CC BY-NC 4.0).